Modern bookshelf speakers have come a long way from their humble origins. While originally designed as space-saving compromises, today's models often rival floorstanding speakers in all but the deepest bass ranges. Let's dive into comparing two popular but different approaches to high-fidelity sound: the premium Revel Concerta2 M16 ($900) and the value-focused KEF Q150 ($350).
Both speakers emerged in the mid-2010s, but their approaches to sound reproduction couldn't be more different. The Revel M16 uses a traditional two-way design, refined through extensive computer modeling and acoustic research. Its 1-inch aluminum dome tweeter sits above a 6.5-inch aluminum cone woofer, with each driver optimized for its frequency range.
The KEF Q150 takes a radically different approach with its Uni-Q driver array. This technology, which KEF has refined over 30 years, places the tweeter in the acoustic center of the midrange cone. Think of it like a point of light - sound radiates from a single point rather than two separate locations, potentially creating a more coherent soundstage.
The way these speakers project sound into your room showcases their different design philosophies. The M16 creates a precise, layered soundstage where each instrument occupies a distinct space. It's like sitting in a concert hall with perfect acoustics - you can close your eyes and point to where each musician would be standing.
The Q150 presents music more holistically. Its Uni-Q driver creates a seamless bubble of sound that's less dependent on your listening position. This can be particularly beneficial in rooms where not everyone can sit in the ideal spot, or for home theater use where viewers are spread across multiple seats.
The Revel excels at revealing minute details in recordings. You'll hear fingers sliding on guitar strings, the subtle decay of cymbal hits, and the natural resonance of concert halls. This level of detail comes at a price - both literally and in terms of system matching. You'll want high-quality amplification and source components to take full advantage of its capabilities.
The KEF takes a more forgiving approach. While still detailed, it smooths over some of recording and equipment imperfections. This makes it more versatile with a wider range of amplifiers and music sources, though it won't reach quite the same heights of resolution as the Revel.
Both speakers offer impressive low-frequency performance for their size, but with different characteristics. The M16 reaches deeper (down to 45Hz vs 51Hz for the Q150) and produces more authoritative bass. This makes it more suitable for use without a subwoofer, particularly in smaller rooms.
The Q150's bass is tighter but less extended. While perfectly adequate for many types of music, home theater enthusiasts will likely want to pair it with a subwoofer for the full impact of movie soundtracks.
The speakers' different designs lead to different requirements for optimal performance. The Revel demands more careful placement - at least 12 inches from walls and precise toe-in (angling toward the listening position) to achieve its best sound. The reward for this effort is exceptional imaging and soundstage depth.
The KEF's Uni-Q driver makes it more forgiving of placement. While it still benefits from careful setup, it maintains more consistent sound quality across different positions. This flexibility can be a significant advantage in real-world living spaces where optimal speaker placement isn't always possible.
At nearly triple the price, the Revel M16 needs to deliver significant performance advantages to justify its cost. For critical listeners with high-quality associated equipment and well-treated rooms, it absolutely can. The speaker's resolution, dynamics, and overall refinement place it firmly in high-end territory.
The KEF Q150 presents an exceptional value proposition. While it doesn't quite match the Revel's ultimate performance, it delivers a substantial portion of that quality at a much lower price point. Its more forgiving nature and placement flexibility make it a practical choice for many listeners.
Both speakers can excel in home theater applications, but with different strengths. The Revel's superior dynamics and bass extension make it particularly good for movie soundtracks, assuming you can position them optimally.
The KEF's wider dispersion pattern and more forgiving nature might make it the better choice for multi-seat home theaters. Its consistent off-axis performance ensures everyone gets good sound, not just the person in the center seat.
Choose the Revel Concerta2 M16 if:
Choose the KEF Q150 if:
While both speakers were released several years ago, their fundamental technologies remain current. KEF has continued to refine their Uni-Q driver in more expensive models, while Revel's traditional approach benefits from ongoing materials and manufacturing improvements. Neither design is likely to become obsolete anytime soon.
The choice ultimately comes down to your priorities and circumstances. The Revel offers exceptional performance for critical listening, while the KEF provides remarkable value and practical advantages for real-world situations. Both represent excellent choices in their respective price categories, and either could serve as the foundation of a high-quality audio system for many years to come.
Revel Concerta2 M16 | KEF Q150 |
---|---|
Price - Key consideration for value assessment | |
$900/pair | $350/pair |
Driver Configuration - Impacts sound coherence and imaging | |
Traditional 2-way: 6.5" woofer + 1" tweeter | Uni-Q coaxial: 5.25" woofer with centered 1" tweeter |
Frequency Response - Determines bass depth and overall range | |
45Hz - 20kHz (-10dB), superior bass extension | 51Hz - 28kHz (-3dB), slightly less bass but extended highs |
Sensitivity - Affects amplifier power requirements | |
86dB @ 2.83V/1m | 86dB @ 2.83V/1m |
Impedance - Important for amplifier compatibility | |
6 ohms nominal (3.7 ohms minimum) | 8 ohms nominal (3.7 ohms minimum) |
Power Handling - Determines volume capability | |
50-120W recommended | 10-100W recommended |
Dimensions - Consider space requirements | |
14.75" x 8.6" x 10.76" (larger cabinet) | 11.9" x 7.9" x 10.9" (more compact) |
Weight - Indicates cabinet construction | |
16 lbs each (heavier, more rigid cabinet) | 12.3 lbs each (lighter but still solid) |
Key Technology - Defines sound character | |
Acoustic Lens waveguide, aluminum drivers | Uni-Q driver array, proprietary crossover |
Placement Flexibility - Critical for room setup | |
Demands precise positioning for best results | More forgiving of placement due to Uni-Q design |
Optimal Use Case - Helps match to listening needs | |
Critical listening, accuracy-focused systems | Versatile use, home theater, wider listening area |
We've done our best to create useful and informative comparisons to help you decide what product to buy. Our research uses advanced automated methods to create this comparison and perfection is not possible - please contact us for corrections or questions. These are the sites we've researched in the creation of this article: audioholics.com - upscaleaudio.com - crutchfield.com - audiosciencereview.com - musicdirect.com - audiolab.com - crutchfield.com - crutchfield.com - avstore.in - speakerdata2034.blogspot.com - spacehifi.com.au - gearadical.com - us.kef.com - digitaltrends.com - crutchfield.com - audiosciencereview.com - ooberpad.com - bestbuy.com%20-%20Satin%20Black/5913623) - youtube.com - international.kef.com - youtube.com