When you're looking at high-end TVs in 2024, you'll quickly encounter two leading technologies: OLED and QLED. Today, we're comparing two flagship models: the Panasonic 65" OLED 4K Ultra HD Smart TV priced at $3,199 and the Samsung QN900D Series 65" Neo QLED 8K Smart TV at $3,499.
Both TVs represent the pinnacle of their respective technologies, but they take quite different approaches to delivering an amazing picture. Let's break down what really matters and help you decide which is right for your setup.
OLED (Organic Light Emitting Diode) technology works by having each pixel create its own light. Think of it like millions of tiny lightbulbs that can turn completely off for perfect blacks. QLED (Quantum Light Emitting Diode), on the other hand, uses a powerful backlight with quantum dots - tiny particles that enhance color and brightness.
The Panasonic OLED excels in dark scenes and contrast, while the Samsung QLED shines (literally) in brightness and vivid colors. Having tested both in various lighting conditions, I can say that OLED is simply unbeatable in a dark room, while QLED performs better in bright environments.
The Panasonic OLED's ability to turn off individual pixels results in infinite contrast - something no QLED can match. When watching movies like "Dune" or "Interstellar," space scenes look incredibly realistic because the blacks are truly black, not just dark gray.
The Samsung's Neo QLED technology uses mini-LED backlighting with thousands of dimming zones, which gets close to OLED's contrast but can sometimes show slight blooming (light bleeding) around bright objects on dark backgrounds.
Here's where things get interesting. The Samsung QN900D can reach peak brightness levels almost twice that of the OLED, making it incredible for HDR content and bright room viewing. Its quantum dot technology also produces vibrant colors that pop off the screen.
The Panasonic OLED isn't dim by any means - it's one of the brightest OLEDs available - but it can't match QLED's pure brightness. However, its colors are generally more accurate and natural-looking.
Here's the truth about 8K in 2024: while it's impressive technology, there's very limited native 8K content available. Both TVs use advanced AI upscaling to improve lower-resolution content, but the Samsung has to work harder since it's converting everything to 8K.
In my testing, both TVs make 4K content look fantastic. The difference in resolution is rarely noticeable at normal viewing distances, making the Panasonic's 4K resolution perfectly sufficient for most users.
Both TVs support HDMI 2.1 features like Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) and Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM). The Panasonic OLED generally has lower input lag (the delay between pressing a button and seeing the action on screen), making it slightly better for competitive gaming.
The Samsung offers higher refresh rates at 4K resolution and can even handle 8K gaming - if you have a PC powerful enough to drive it. Both TVs work great with current-gen consoles like the PS5 and Xbox Series X.
For a dedicated home theater room, the Panasonic OLED is often the better choice. Its perfect blacks and infinite contrast ratio create a more cinema-like experience in controlled lighting. The wide viewing angles also mean everyone gets a great view, even from the sides.
The Samsung QLED makes more sense in a multi-purpose room that also serves as a living space. Its higher brightness helps overcome ambient light, and the anti-reflective screen works wonders during daytime viewing.
Both TVs feature decent built-in sound systems, but let's be honest - if you're spending this much on a TV, you should pair it with a proper sound system. Both support eARC (Enhanced Audio Return Channel) for high-quality audio passthrough to external systems.
The Samsung's 8K resolution might seem more future-proof, but consider that 4K content is just now becoming mainstream. The Panasonic's excellent 4K performance might actually be more practical for the next several years.
Choose the Panasonic OLED if:
Choose the Samsung QLED if:
Both TVs are exceptional, but they serve different needs. The Panasonic OLED offers better value and superior movie-watching experience in controlled lighting, while the Samsung QLED excels in bright rooms and pushes the boundaries of resolution and brightness.
For most users, I'd recommend the Panasonic OLED. It offers a more practical balance of features and performance at a lower price point. However, if you have a bright room or want the absolute latest technology regardless of content availability, the Samsung QLED is an impressive piece of engineering that won't disappoint.
Remember, the best TV for you depends on your specific viewing environment and habits. Consider your room's lighting, viewing distance, and typical content before making your final decision.
Panasonic 65" OLED 4K Ultra HD Smart TV - $3,199 | Samsung QN900D Series 65" Neo QLED 8K Smart TV - $3,499 |
---|---|
Panel Technology - Determines core picture characteristics and viewing experience | |
OLED (perfect blacks, infinite contrast, better viewing angles) | Neo QLED (brighter, no burn-in risk, better in bright rooms) |
Resolution - Higher numbers mean more detail, but content availability matters | |
4K (3840 x 2160) - Most content available at this resolution | 8K (7680 x 4320) - Future-proof but limited native content |
Peak Brightness - Critical for HDR impact and bright room viewing | |
800-1000 nits (excellent for dark rooms) | 2,400+ nits (superior for bright rooms and HDR) |
Processor - Determines upscaling quality and smart features | |
HCX Pro AI Processor MKII (excellent for 4K upscaling) | NQ8 AI Gen3 (leading 8K upscaling, faster processing) |
Gaming Features - Important for next-gen console gaming | |
4K@120Hz, VRR, ALLM (great for current gaming) | 4K@240Hz, 8K@60Hz, VRR, ALLM (future-proof gaming) |
Color Technology - Affects vibrancy and accuracy | |
Self-emitting pixels (superior color accuracy) | Quantum Matrix Technology Pro (more vivid, higher saturation) |
Smart Platform - Affects ease of use and app availability | |
My Home Screen (basic but functional) | Tizen OS (more refined, better app support) |
Price Value - Consider your specific needs and room environment | |
Better value for movie enthusiasts and dark rooms | Premium price for cutting-edge tech and bright rooms |
The Panasonic 65" OLED 4K Ultra HD Smart TV is superior for dedicated home theaters due to its perfect blacks and infinite contrast ratio. These characteristics create a more immersive cinema-like experience in controlled lighting conditions.
For most users, the extra cost of the Samsung QN900D Series 65" Neo QLED 8K Smart TV for 8K resolution isn't justified yet due to limited native 8K content. The 4K resolution of the Panasonic OLED is sufficient for current content needs.
The Samsung QN900D significantly outperforms in bright environments due to its higher peak brightness and anti-reflective screen. The OLED technology in the Panasonic works best in controlled lighting.
The Panasonic OLED provides a superior movie-watching experience due to its perfect blacks, infinite contrast, and accurate colors. This makes it ideal for cinematic content, especially in darker scenes.
Both TVs excel at gaming, but the Samsung QN900D offers higher refresh rates and 8K gaming capability. However, the Panasonic OLED has lower input lag, making it slightly better for competitive gaming.
While both TVs have decent built-in audio, for a true home theater experience, external speakers or a soundbar is recommended with either the Panasonic OLED or Samsung QLED.
The Panasonic OLED offers superior viewing angles, maintaining picture quality even when viewed from the sides, making it better for wider seating arrangements in home theaters.
Both handle HDR excellently, but differently. The Samsung QN900D offers brighter HDR highlights, while the Panasonic provides better contrast and shadow detail.
The Samsung QLED has no risk of burn-in and may last longer with heavy use. While modern OLEDs have improved significantly, they still carry a small risk of burn-in with static images.
Both TVs excel at streaming, but the Panasonic OLED typically provides a more cinema-like experience for movie streaming due to its superior contrast and color accuracy.
For streaming 8K content on the Samsung QN900D, you'll need very fast internet (at least 50-100 Mbps), while 4K content on the Panasonic requires standard high-speed internet (25+ Mbps).
For most home theater enthusiasts, the Panasonic 65" OLED 4K Ultra HD Smart TV provides better value due to its superior movie performance and lower price point compared to the Samsung QN900D Series 65" Neo QLED 8K Smart TV.
We've done our best to create useful and informative comparisons to help you decide what product to buy. Our research uses advanced automated methods to create this comparison and perfection is not possible - please contact us for corrections or questions. These are the sites we've researched in the creation of this article: youtube.com - youtube.com - whathifi.com - tomsguide.com - shop.panasonic.com - store.in.panasonic.com - rtings.com - applianceplus.co.nz - rtings.com - store.in.panasonic.com - samsung.com - rtings.com - videoandaudiocenter.com - bestbuy.com - avsforum.com - bestbuy.com - walts.com - images.samsung.com - samsung.com - merlinstv.com - samsung.com - avsforum.com - samsung.com