In the ever-evolving world of portable audio, two distinctly different approaches to solving the portable speaker challenge have emerged. Today, we're comparing the premium Marshall Emberton III with the ultra-portable JBL Clip 4 to help you understand which might better suit your needs.
Portable Bluetooth speakers have come a long way from their early tinny-sounding predecessors. Modern speakers pack impressive audio technology into increasingly durable and compact forms. The key advances we're seeing in 2023 include better battery life, improved water resistance, and more sophisticated audio processing that helps small speakers sound bigger than they should.
Both speakers in our comparison launched in 2023, with Marshall's offering representing their third generation of the Emberton line and JBL's fourth iteration of their popular Clip series. Each takes a notably different approach to portable audio, which makes this comparison particularly interesting.
The Marshall Emberton III implements what they call "True Stereophonic" technology - essentially creating a 360-degree soundstage that helps the speaker sound great regardless of its orientation. In testing, this proves particularly effective in small to medium-sized rooms, where the sound seems to fill the space more naturally than traditional directional speakers.
Its audio signature leans toward what you'd expect from Marshall - clear mids, detailed highs, and just enough bass to keep things interesting without overwhelming the mix. The speaker uses dual 2-inch drivers paired with passive radiators (which are like speakers without their own power that move in response to the powered speakers, helping create better bass response).
The JBL Clip 4, by contrast, focuses on personal listening. Its single driver setup prioritizes vocal clarity and mid-range performance - perfect for podcasts and personal music listening, but less suited for filling a room. The bass response is present but notably limited compared to the Emberton III, which is expected given its much smaller size.
Here's where we see one of the biggest differentiators. The Emberton III boasts an impressive 32-hour battery life - a significant improvement over its predecessor's 20 hours. Even more impressive is its fast-charging capability, providing 6 hours of playback from just 20 minutes of charging.
The Clip 4's 10-hour battery life, while respectable for its size, can't compete with the Emberton III's endurance. However, for its intended use case as a personal portable speaker, 10 hours is typically sufficient for a few days of regular use.
Both speakers use USB-C charging, which is a welcome modern standard. The Emberton III takes about 3 hours for a full charge, while the Clip 4 requires roughly the same time - though it's charging a much smaller battery.
Both speakers feature IP67 ratings, meaning they're both dust-proof and can handle being submerged in water up to 1 meter deep for 30 minutes. This is particularly impressive for the Emberton III, given its more premium positioning.
The design philosophies couldn't be more different:
The Emberton III includes Bluetooth 5.3 with LE (Low Energy) support, setting it up for future features like Auracast (a technology that will allow broadcasting to multiple compatible speakers). It also supports connecting to two devices simultaneously, which is handy for switching between your phone and laptop.
The Clip 4 uses Bluetooth 5.1, which provides reliable connectivity but lacks some of the newer features. However, it does offer impressively low audio latency, making it great for watching videos without noticeable audio delay.
Having tested both speakers in various scenarios, here's how they perform in different situations:
The Marshall Emberton III at $169.99 represents a significant investment compared to the JBL Clip 4 at $49.99. However, the value equation isn't as simple as comparing price tags.
The Emberton III delivers:
The Clip 4 offers:
Consider these key questions:
Both speakers excel in their intended use cases. The Marshall Emberton III stands out as a premium portable speaker that doesn't compromise on sound quality or battery life, making it ideal for those who prioritize audio performance and are willing to pay for it. The JBL Clip 4 shines as an ultra-portable option that delivers impressive value for personal listening needs.
Remember: The best speaker is the one that fits your specific needs and use cases. Don't just buy the more expensive option assuming it's better - consider how you'll actually use it and choose accordingly.
Marshall Emberton III ($169.99) | JBL Clip 4 ($49.99) |
---|---|
Sound Output - Determines volume capability and room coverage | |
Dual 2" drivers with passive radiators, room-filling 360° sound | Single driver, personal listening oriented |
Battery Life - Critical for extended use without charging | |
32 hours, 20-min quick charge for 6 hours | 10 hours, 3-hour full charge |
Weight - Impacts portability and carrying convenience | |
1.5 lbs (0.67 kg) - Substantial but manageable | 0.53 lbs (0.239 kg) - Ultra-lightweight |
Durability Rating - Protection against water and dust | |
IP67 waterproof and dustproof | IP67 waterproof and dustproof |
Bluetooth Version - Affects connection quality and features | |
5.3 LE with Auracast support (future update) | 5.1, basic connectivity |
Special Features - Additional functionality beyond basic audio | |
Multi-device pairing, app EQ control, built-in mic | Integrated carabiner clip, low audio latency |
Size - Physical space required for storage/transport | |
6.3" x 2.7" x 3" - Compact but substantial | 3.4" x 5.3" x 1.8" - Highly compact |
Frequency Response - Range of sound reproduction | |
65-20,000 Hz (better bass extension) | 100-20,000 Hz (limited low-end) |
Charging Port - Convenience and compatibility | |
USB-C with fast charging support | USB-C standard charging |
Primary Use Case - Best suited environment | |
Small gatherings, room audio, extended outdoor use | Personal listening, active lifestyle, travel |
The Marshall Emberton III ($169.99) is significantly better for home theater use due to its 360° sound coverage and stronger bass response. While neither speaker is designed primarily for home theater, the Emberton III's dual drivers and higher volume capability make it more suitable as a temporary solution or for enhancing TV audio in small spaces. The JBL Clip 4 ($49.99) lacks the power and range needed for home theater applications.
The Marshall Emberton III costs $169.99, while the JBL Clip 4 is priced at $49.99, making it $120 less expensive. This significant price difference reflects their different target markets and capabilities.
The Marshall Emberton III offers superior battery life at 32 hours, compared to the JBL Clip 4's 10 hours. The Emberton III also features quick charging, providing 6 hours of playback from a 20-minute charge.
Both speakers feature IP67 waterproof and dustproof ratings, making them suitable for outdoor use. The Marshall Emberton III is better for outdoor gatherings due to its louder volume, while the JBL Clip 4 is ideal for personal outdoor activities.
The Marshall Emberton III delivers superior sound quality with its dual 2" drivers and passive radiators, offering fuller bass and better overall clarity. The JBL Clip 4 provides adequate sound for personal listening but can't match the Emberton III's audio performance.
While both speakers can connect to TVs via Bluetooth (if the TV supports it), the Marshall Emberton III is the better choice due to its superior sound quality and volume. However, neither speaker is an ideal primary TV audio solution compared to dedicated soundbars.
The JBL Clip 4 is significantly more portable at 0.53 lbs with an integrated carabiner clip. The Marshall Emberton III is still portable but heavier at 1.5 lbs and lacks attachment options.
The Marshall Emberton III will support Auracast for multi-speaker streaming in a future update. The JBL Clip 4 doesn't support multi-room audio functionality.
The Marshall Emberton III is better for movie watching with its fuller sound range and higher volume capability. The JBL Clip 4 has lower latency but lacks the audio quality needed for an immersive movie experience.
The Marshall Emberton III can handle small party situations with its room-filling sound and long battery life. The JBL Clip 4 is not suitable for parties as it's designed for personal listening.
The Marshall Emberton III offers Bluetooth 5.3 with LE support and can connect to multiple devices simultaneously. The JBL Clip 4 uses Bluetooth 5.1 with basic connectivity features.
For personal portable use, the JBL Clip 4 offers excellent value at $49.99. However, if you need better sound quality and features, the Marshall Emberton III justifies its higher price with superior performance, battery life, and future-proof features.
We've done our best to create useful and informative comparisons to help you decide what product to buy. Our research uses advanced automated methods to create this comparison and perfection is not possible - please contact us for corrections or questions. These are the sites we've researched in the creation of this article: techradar.com - bgr.com - androidcentral.com - crutchfield.com - goodhousekeeping.com - bhphotovideo.com - youtube.com - youtube.com - timesofindia.indiatimes.com - bestbuy.com - group.marshall.com - youtube.com - outeraudio.com - jbl.com - rtings.com - youtube.com - jbl.com - harmanaudio.com - youtube.com - ggelectronics.com - greentoe.com - soundstagexperience.com