If you're in the market for a portable Bluetooth speaker, you've probably noticed there are countless options across every price point. Today, we're comparing two popular but distinctly different approaches: the premium $169 Marshall Emberton II and the ultra-portable $70 JBL Clip 4.
The portable speaker market has evolved significantly since 2020, with improvements in battery technology, water resistance, and sound quality in smaller form factors. Modern speakers need to balance several key factors:
The Marshall Emberton II takes a premium approach with its True Stereophonic system, which creates an impressive 360-degree soundstage using two 2-inch full-range drivers and two passive radiators. In practical terms, this means you'll hear clear separation between instruments and vocals from any position around the speaker. The bass response, while not earth-shattering, is notably full for its size, especially in the 60-150Hz range where many portable speakers struggle.
The JBL Clip 4 uses a single driver design focused on clarity in the mid-range frequencies (where human voices live). While it can't match the Emberton II's bass response or volume levels, it excels at its intended use - personal listening at closer ranges. The speaker's 100Hz-20kHz frequency response means you'll miss some deep bass notes, but the overall sound remains clear and engaging for podcasts and most music genres.
Battery technology has improved significantly since these speakers' releases. The Emberton II leads with an impressive 30+ hours of playback time, while the Clip 4 offers 10 hours. However, real-world testing shows these numbers are based on 50% volume levels. At higher volumes, expect:
Emberton II:
Clip 4:
Both speakers feature IP67 water and dust resistance, meaning they can handle submersion in 1 meter of water for 30 minutes. However, their approaches to portability differ significantly:
The Emberton II (1.5 lbs) feels substantial and premium, with a solid metal grille and durable silicone exterior. It's designed to sit on flat surfaces and resists tipping over thanks to its rectangular design.
The Clip 4 (0.5 lbs) embraces true portability with its integrated carabiner clip and ultra-lightweight design. The clip isn't just an afterthought - it's built into the frame and can support the speaker's weight reliably.
Both speakers use Bluetooth 5.1, but the Emberton II adds multi-device support, allowing two devices to connect simultaneously. This is particularly useful for shared listening situations or when switching between devices.
The Emberton II includes a multi-directional control knob and companion app support for EQ adjustments and firmware updates. The Clip 4 takes a minimalist approach with basic controls and no app support, prioritizing simplicity over customization.
Emberton II:
Clip 4:
Having tested both speakers in various environments, here's how they perform in specific situations:
The Emberton II's 360-degree sound works exceptionally well in outdoor settings, filling a larger area with consistent sound. However, the Clip 4's ability to clip onto backpacks or beach chairs makes it more practical for active outdoor use.
While neither speaker is designed primarily for home theater use, the Emberton II can serve as a decent TV speaker in small rooms thanks to its stereo separation and stronger bass response. The Clip 4's directional sound and limited bass make it less suitable for this purpose.
The Clip 4 excels during travel, easily attaching to bags and taking minimal space. The Emberton II, while portable, requires more deliberate packing and consideration.
The Marshall Emberton II justifies its higher price through superior sound quality, battery life, and build quality. It's a premium speaker that can serve as a primary audio device for many situations.
The JBL Clip 4 delivers exceptional value for its price, focusing on portability and durability rather than competing with larger speakers on pure sound quality.
Choose the Marshall Emberton II if:
Choose the JBL Clip 4 if:
Both speakers excel at their intended purposes while taking very different approaches. The Emberton II represents the premium end of portable speakers, while the Clip 4 maximizes portability and value. Your choice should align with how you'll actually use the speaker rather than just specs alone.
Remember that the $100 price difference could instead be used for accessories or even multiple Clip 4s for different locations. Consider your specific needs and use cases carefully before making a decision.
Marshall Emberton II | JBL Clip 4 |
---|---|
Price - Initial Investment | |
$169 (premium tier) | $70 (mid-range tier) |
Sound Output - Determines volume and clarity | |
2x 10W drivers with passive radiators, 360° sound | Single 5W driver, directional sound |
Battery Life - Critical for portable use | |
30+ hours (20-25 at 70% volume) | 10 hours (7-8 at 70% volume) |
Size & Weight - Affects portability | |
3.4 x 6.3 x 2.7 inches, 1.5 lbs | 3.4 x 5.3 x 1.8 inches, 0.53 lbs |
Water/Dust Resistance - Important for outdoor use | |
IP67 (fully waterproof and dustproof) | IP67 (fully waterproof and dustproof) |
Frequency Response - Determines bass capability | |
60Hz - 20kHz (better bass response) | 100Hz - 20kHz (limited bass) |
Charging - Convenience factor | |
USB-C, 20min quick charge = 4hrs playback | USB-C, no quick charge |
Special Features - Added functionality | |
Multi-speaker pairing, app control, EQ presets | Integrated carabiner clip, speakerphone |
Bluetooth Version - Connection quality | |
5.1 with multi-device support | 5.1 single device |
Construction - Build quality and durability | |
Metal grille, premium silicone, recycled plastic | Durable fabric and plastic, metal carabiner |
The $169 Marshall Emberton II is significantly better for home theater use due to its True Stereophonic sound and stronger bass response. While neither is designed primarily for TV audio, the Emberton II's 360-degree sound coverage and dual drivers make it a viable temporary solution for small rooms. The $70 JBL Clip 4 isn't recommended for home theater use.
The Marshall Emberton II offers superior battery life with 30+ hours of playback, compared to the JBL Clip 4's 10 hours. For movie watching sessions, the Emberton II can last through multiple movie marathons without recharging.
Yes, both speakers feature IP67 water and dust resistance ratings. However, the Clip 4's integrated carabiner makes it more practical for active outdoor use, while the Emberton II is better suited for stationary outdoor listening.
The Marshall Emberton II delivers notably better sound quality with its dual 10W drivers and passive radiators. It offers fuller bass, better stereo separation, and higher maximum volume compared to the JBL Clip 4.
The $100 price difference is justified if you prioritize sound quality and battery life. The Emberton II offers premium features, while the Clip 4 provides excellent value for portable use at a lower price point.
The Marshall Emberton II supports multi-device connectivity, allowing two devices to connect simultaneously. The JBL Clip 4 only supports single-device connection.
The JBL Clip 4 is superior for travel due to its ultra-lightweight design (0.53 lbs) and integrated carabiner clip. The Emberton II, while portable, is heavier (1.5 lbs) and less convenient to pack.
Neither speaker is designed for surround sound systems. While the Emberton II offers Stack Mode to connect multiple speakers, this feature is for expanded stereo coverage, not true surround sound.
Neither the Marshall Emberton II nor the JBL Clip 4 directly supports voice assistants. They function purely as Bluetooth speakers.
The Emberton II features a multi-directional control knob and companion app support for EQ adjustments. The Clip 4 offers basic button controls without app support, prioritizing simplicity.
The JBL Clip 4 can be hung using its carabiner clip, though it's not ideal for permanent mounting. The Emberton II isn't designed for wall mounting and works best on flat surfaces.
For home entertainment, the Marshall Emberton II offers better value despite its higher price, thanks to superior sound quality, longer battery life, and better room coverage. The JBL Clip 4 is better suited for personal, portable use rather than home entertainment.
We've done our best to create useful and informative comparisons to help you decide what product to buy. Our research uses advanced automated methods to create this comparison and perfection is not possible - please contact us for corrections or questions. These are the sites we've researched in the creation of this article: techradar.com - dreamwaveus.com - crutchfield.com - soundguys.com - gadgets360.com - rtings.com - youtube.com - youtube.com - youtube.com - shop.ash-asia.com - crutchfield.com - gadgetstyler.com - youtube.com - avstore.in - youtube.com - outeraudio.com - jbl.com - rtings.com - youtube.com - jbl.com - harmanaudio.com - youtube.com - ggelectronics.com - greentoe.com - soundstagexperience.com