When it comes to home audio, Klipsch is a name that's been around since 1946, known for their horn-loaded speaker designs and dynamic sound. Today, we're comparing two popular bookshelf speakers from different tiers of their lineup: the premium RP-600M II
($649) and the budget-friendly R-51M
($199).
Before diving into the comparison, let's talk about what makes bookshelf speakers special. Despite their name, these compact speakers often work best on dedicated stands, positioned at ear level. They're designed to deliver high-quality sound in small to medium-sized rooms, making them perfect for apartments, offices, or as part of a larger home theater setup.
The RP-600M II
represents Klipsch's latest speaker technology, released in 2021 as an upgrade to their popular RP-600M. The most noticeable improvement is in the horn design - they've refined their Tractrix horn (the distinctive copper-colored flare around the tweeter) to reduce what audiophiles call "horn coloration," making the sound more natural and less aggressive.
The R-51M
, introduced in 2018, uses a more basic horn design but still benefits from Klipsch's expertise. While both speakers use horn-loaded tweeters (the small driver that handles high frequencies), the RP-600M II's implementation is notably more sophisticated. In practical terms, this means smoother, more detailed high frequencies and better sound dispersion throughout your room.
One of the biggest differences is in the low-end performance. The RP-600M II uses a larger 6.5-inch woofer (the driver that handles bass frequencies) made from Cerametallic material - a lightweight, rigid aluminum formulation that helps prevent distortion. It can reach down to 44Hz, which means you'll hear deep bass notes that the R-51M, with its 5.25-inch woofer and 62Hz lower limit, simply can't reproduce.
In real-world listening, this means the RP-600M II can handle complex orchestral music or bass-heavy genres like electronic or hip-hop with more authority. The R-51M still performs admirably for its size but might benefit from adding a subwoofer for home theater use.
Both speakers feature Klipsch's signature copper-colored accents, but the RP-600M II takes build quality to another level. Its cabinet uses better internal bracing and a more sophisticated port design (the tube that helps enhance bass response). The magnetic grilles attach more securely, and the binding posts (where you connect speaker wire) are higher quality, supporting bi-wiring or bi-amping for advanced setups.
Having spent time with both speakers, the RP-600M II clearly justifies its higher price for serious music listeners. Its refined sound lets you hear more detail in complex recordings - individual instruments are easier to locate in space, and vocals have a more natural presence. The R-51M is no slouch, delivering the exciting, dynamic sound Klipsch is known for, but it can sometimes sound a bit harsh with certain types of music, especially at higher volumes.
For home theater applications, both speakers can work well, but with different considerations. The RP-600M II
excels as front left/right speakers in a surround setup, providing enough bass that you might not need a subwoofer for casual viewing. The R-51M
makes more sense as surround speakers or in a smaller room where its limited bass response isn't as noticeable.
The price difference between these speakers is significant - you could buy two pairs of R-51Ms for the price of one pair of RP-600M IIs. But here's how I think about it:
Since the R-51M's release, Klipsch has made several technological advances that appear in the RP-600M II:
Choose the RP-600M II if:
Choose the R-51M if:
Both speakers represent good value in their respective price categories. The R-51M
delivers impressive performance for its price point and makes an excellent entry into quality audio. The RP-600M II
justifies its higher price through noticeably better sound quality and construction, making it a worthy investment for those who prioritize audio performance.
Remember that speaker choice is highly personal, and if possible, listening to both options in your space is the best way to make a decision. Both models maintain Klipsch's reputation for dynamic, engaging sound - they just do it at different price points and performance levels.
Klipsch RP-600M II ($649) | Klipsch R-51M ($199) |
---|---|
Woofer Size - Larger woofers generally provide deeper, more impactful bass | |
6.5" Cerametallic | 5.25" Aluminum IMG |
Frequency Response - Determines bass depth and overall range of sound reproduction | |
44-25,000 Hz (±3dB) - Noticeably deeper bass | 62-21,000 Hz (±3dB) - May need a subwoofer |
Sensitivity - Higher sensitivity means speaker needs less power to play loud | |
94dB - Excellent efficiency | 93dB - Very good efficiency |
Power Handling - Higher power handling allows more dynamic range without distortion | |
100W RMS - Ideal for medium/large rooms | 85W RMS - Better for smaller spaces |
Build Quality - Better materials and construction reduce unwanted resonance | |
Premium Tractrix horn, advanced bracing, bi-wire capable | Basic horn design, standard construction |
Port Design - Better port design reduces turbulence and allows more placement options | |
Advanced Tractrix port with custom inner flares | Basic rear port design |
Weight - Heavier weight often indicates better build quality and components | |
18.1 lbs each - Substantial build | 11 lbs each - Standard build |
Best Use Case - Consider your primary listening needs | |
Critical listening, premium home theater, larger rooms | Entry-level systems, surrounds, smaller rooms |
Value Proposition - Consider long-term satisfaction vs. initial cost | |
Premium investment for audiophile performance | Excellent value for casual listening |
For home theater use, the RP-600M II
($649) is significantly better as main front speakers due to deeper bass response and better dynamics. However, the R-51M
($199) makes excellent surround speakers or works well in smaller home theater setups where budget is a concern.
The RP-600M II can perform adequately without a subwoofer for music and casual TV watching due to its 44Hz bass extension. The R-51M, with its 62Hz lower limit, will benefit more from a subwoofer for home theater use.
The R-51M
offers exceptional value for casual listeners and basic home theater setups. The RP-600M II
justifies its higher price through superior performance but costs over three times more.
Yes, both models work well in surround systems. The R-51M is particularly cost-effective as surround speakers, while the RP-600M II excels as front left/right channels.
The RP-600M II works well in medium to large rooms (up to 400 sq ft), while the R-51M is better suited for smaller spaces (under 200 sq ft).
The RP-600M II handles up to 100W RMS, while the R-51M manages 85W RMS. Both are efficient speakers, working well with most modern receivers.
Both perform well for streaming. The RP-600M II offers more detail and better bass, making it superior for critical listening, while the R-51M provides good performance for casual listening.
The RP-600M II
has superior midrange clarity, making dialogue more distinct. The R-51M
performs adequately but can sound less refined with voices.
Yes, both work well for TV audio. The RP-600M II provides a more cinema-like experience, while the R-51M offers good performance for everyday TV watching.
While both can be shelf-mounted, they perform best on proper speaker stands. This is especially true for the RP-600M II due to its superior imaging capabilities.
The R-51M might be more suitable for apartments due to its more modest bass output, which is less likely to disturb neighbors. However, both speakers can work well with volume management.
The RP-600M II
represents a more future-proof investment with its superior build quality and performance headroom. The R-51M
is still well-built but designed more as an entry-level option.
We've done our best to create useful and informative comparisons to help you decide what product to buy. Our research uses advanced automated methods to create this comparison and perfection is not possible - please contact us for corrections or questions. These are the sites we've researched in the creation of this article: erinsaudiocorner.com - crutchfield.com - walts.com - audiosciencereview.com - therobinsonbrand.com - youtube.com - klipsch.com - abt.com - qobuz.com - bhphotovideo.com - youtube.com - support.klipsch.com - cnet.com - youtube.com - community.klipsch.com - klipsch.com - catchgroove.com - techx.com.my - audiovideoplus.ca - target.com - crutchfield.com - voitektv.com - d2um2qdswy1tb0.cloudfront.net