When Klipsch introduced the Reference Premiere RP-500M in 2018, it quickly became a favorite among audio enthusiasts looking for high-quality bookshelf speakers. In 2022, they launched the RP-500M II, promising several improvements to an already successful design. Let's explore what these changes mean for your listening experience and whether the price difference is worth it.
Before diving into comparisons, let's understand what makes bookshelf speakers special. Despite their name, these compact speakers aren't meant to sit on your bookshelf - they perform best on dedicated stands that place them at ear level. They're designed to deliver high-fidelity sound in small to medium-sized rooms without dominating your space like floor-standing speakers would.
The magic of good bookshelf speakers lies in their ability to create an immersive "soundstage" - imagine a three-dimensional space where instruments and vocals appear to come from specific locations between and around the speakers. Both RP-500M models excel at this, but with some notable differences.
The RP-500M II ($419) brings several meaningful improvements over its predecessor RP-500M ($299). The most noticeable enhancement is in the midrange frequencies - where most vocals and instruments live. The II version delivers clearer, more detailed reproduction of voices and acoustic instruments.
In practical terms, these improvements translate to:
The RP-500M II offers a more refined experience, with better separation between instruments and more natural-sounding vocals. Bass notes have more weight and definition, though neither model will shake your walls without a subwoofer - they're bookshelf speakers after all.
Both models work excellently as front speakers in a home theater setup. The II version's improved midrange clarity makes movie dialogue more intelligible, while its better bass response helps with sound effects. However, for a complete home theater experience, you'll want to pair either model with a subwoofer for those deep movie explosions.
Here's where things get interesting. At $299, the original RP-500M represents excellent value for money. It still offers the core Klipsch sound signature - dynamic, detailed, and engaging. The RP-500M II at $419 brings noticeable improvements, but whether these are worth the extra $120 depends on your priorities.
Since the original model's release, speaker technology has evolved in subtle but important ways:
The II version incorporates these advances, resulting in a more technically accomplished speaker.
Both models share similar setup requirements:
The II version is slightly more forgiving with placement thanks to its improved horn design, but both models reward careful setup with excellent sound quality.
Having spent time with both models, I find the II version's improvements genuine and meaningful, particularly in how it handles complex musical passages and vocal reproduction. However, the original model remains impressive, especially considering its lower price point.
For home theater use, both models excel, but if you're building a complete system, the money saved with the original model could go toward a better subwoofer or center channel - crucial components for movie watching.
The Klipsch RP-500M II represents a meaningful evolution of an already excellent speaker. Its improvements in midrange clarity, bass response, and overall refinement make it a worthy upgrade for those seeking the best possible sound quality in this price range. However, the original RP-500M remains a compelling choice, offering much of what makes Klipsch speakers special at a more accessible price point.
Remember, both models will benefit from quality amplification and proper setup. The best choice depends on your specific needs, budget, and how critical your listening habits are. Either way, you'll be getting speakers that carry the Klipsch heritage of dynamic, engaging sound that can bring your music and movies to life.
Klipsch RP-500M II | Klipsch RP-500M |
---|---|
Price - Initial investment consideration | |
$419 | $299 |
Sensitivity - Determines how much amplifier power you need | |
92dB @ 2.83V/1m (needs less power) | 93dB @ 2.83V/1m (slightly more efficient) |
Bass Response - Important for music fullness without subwoofer | |
50-25kHz (deeper, more controlled bass) | 48-25kHz (slightly different tuning) |
Voice Coil - Affects audio accuracy and power handling | |
70% larger than original (better control, less distortion) | Standard size (good but less refined) |
Cabinet Depth - Impacts bass response and room placement | |
10.65" (fuller sound, needs more space) | 9.50" (more compact, slightly less bass) |
Tweeter Design - Affects high frequency detail and dispersion | |
New hybrid cross-section horn (wider sweet spot) | Original horn design (more directional) |
Woofer Technology - Influences midrange clarity and bass control | |
Updated Cerametallic with shorting rings (clearer mids) | Original Cerametallic design (good but less refined) |
Build Quality - Affects longevity and appearance | |
Enhanced bracing, premium finishes (worth upgrade if keeping long-term) | Standard bracing, good finishes (still well-built) |
Port Design - Impacts bass clarity and placement flexibility | |
Enhanced Tractrix port (cleaner bass, less placement sensitive) | Standard Tractrix port (good but more placement sensitive) |
Both speakers work well, but the RP-500M II has better dialogue clarity and smoother integration with surround speakers. However, the original RP-500M remains a solid choice if budget is a concern, especially when building a complete system.
The RP-500M II at $419 offers noticeable improvements in sound quality, but the RP-500M at $299 provides excellent value. The extra $120 is worth it if you prioritize sound quality over budget.
For home theater use, yes. While both speakers have good bass, a subwoofer is recommended for both the RP-500M II and RP-500M to handle deep movie effects below 50Hz.
The RP-500M II offers superior midrange clarity and better bass control, making it the better choice for critical music listening. The original RP-500M still performs well but lacks some refinement.
Both models are best suited for small to medium rooms. For larger spaces over 400 square feet, consider floor-standing speakers instead of either the RP-500M II or RP-500M.
Both models are efficient, but aim for at least 50 watts per channel. The RP-500M II and RP-500M will work with most modern receivers rated 50-100 watts per channel.
Yes, both make excellent front channels in a surround system. The RP-500M II integrates slightly better with other speakers, but the RP-500M also performs well in surround setups.
The RP-500M II features improved cabinet bracing and premium finishes. While the original RP-500M is well-built, the II version has superior construction quality.
Neither model is designed for wall-mounting. Both the RP-500M II and RP-500M perform best on proper speaker stands away from walls.
Both models excel with digital sources. The RP-500M II reveals more detail in high-quality streams, while the RP-500M remains enjoyable with various streaming qualities.
The RP-500M II has improved midrange clarity, making it better for dialogue. However, the RP-500M still performs well, especially when paired with a good center channel.
If you're satisfied with your current RP-500M, an upgrade to the RP-500M II isn't essential. Consider upgrading only if you're seeking improved sound quality and have the budget.
We've done our best to create useful and informative comparisons to help you decide what product to buy. Our research uses advanced automated methods to create this comparison and perfection is not possible - please contact us for corrections or questions. These are the sites we've researched in the creation of this article: erinsaudiocorner.com - safeandsoundhq.com - audioadvice.com - youtube.com - crutchfield.com - klipsch.com - youtube.com - d2um2qdswy1tb0.cloudfront.net - abt.com - crutchfield.com - klipsch.com - audioadvisor.com - crutchfield.ca - target.com - bestbuy.com - f072605def1c9a5ef179-a0bc3fbf1884fc0965506ae2b946e1cd.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com - snapav.com - sweetwater.com