When it comes to high-quality bookshelf speakers, KEF has long been a respected name in audio. Today, we're comparing two of their popular models: the $704 Q350 and the $1,440 LS50 Meta. I've spent considerable time with both speakers, and while they share some DNA, they serve different needs and budgets.
Before diving into the comparison, let's talk about what makes bookshelf speakers special. Despite their name, these speakers usually perform best on dedicated stands, not actual bookshelves. They're compact enough for most rooms while delivering sound quality that can rival larger tower speakers.
The sweet spot for bookshelf speakers is their balance of size, performance, and value. They're particularly great for:
The KEF Q350, released in 2017, represented a significant upgrade to KEF's Q series. Its key feature is the Uni-Q driver array - imagine a tweeter (the speaker that handles high frequencies) placed exactly in the center of the midrange driver (handling voices and most instruments). This design helps create more natural sound because all frequencies come from the same point in space, just like in real life.
The LS50 Meta, launched in 2020, takes this technology further. It introduces what KEF calls Metamaterial Absorption Technology (MAT) - think of it as a highly sophisticated sound absorber that catches unwanted sound waves inside the speaker before they can cause distortion. It's like having a tiny acoustic black hole inside your speaker that absorbs 99% of unwanted sound.
Both speakers handle bass differently:
Here's where things get interesting:
The LS50 Meta's MAT technology really shows its worth here:
I've tested both speakers in various settings, and here's what stands out:
The Q350 excels with:
The LS50 Meta shines with:
Both speakers work well in home theater setups, but there are differences:
For home theater use, I'd recommend either speaker be paired with a good subwoofer. Both integrate well with KEF's matching center channels for a complete surround setup.
Let's talk about what you're getting for your money:
Your choice should depend on several factors:
Consider your space:
Think about your other components:
Consider your upgrade path:
Both speakers represent excellent value in their respective price brackets. The Q350 offers tremendous performance for the money and would satisfy most listeners. The LS50 Meta brings genuine technological innovations and superior performance for those willing to invest more.
My personal take? If budget allows, the LS50 Meta's improvements in clarity, detail, and overall refinement make it worth the premium. However, the Q350 remains one of the best values in high-end audio, and choosing it isn't settling - it's being smart with your money.
Remember, speakers are just one part of your system. Whether you choose the Q350 or LS50 Meta, invest in good amplification, proper placement, and room treatment for the best results. Both speakers will reward you with years of musical enjoyment when set up correctly.
KEF Q350 - $704 | KEF LS50 Meta - $1,440 |
---|---|
Driver Technology - Determines overall sound quality and imaging | |
Uni-Q driver array | 12th gen Uni-Q + MAT technology (99% less distortion) |
Frequency Response - Shows bass capabilities and overall range | |
63Hz - 28kHz (±3dB) - stronger bass | 79Hz - 28kHz (±3dB) - tighter but less deep bass |
Sensitivity - Affects how much power needed from amplifier | |
87dB - easier to drive | 85dB - needs more powerful amp |
Recommended Amp Power - Critical for matching with your system | |
15-120W - works with most amps | 40-100W - more demanding of amp quality |
Size (H x W x D) - Important for placement planning | |
362 x 210 x 306 mm - larger cabinet | 302 x 200 x 278 mm - more compact |
Weight - Indicates cabinet construction quality | |
7.6kg each - solid build | 7.8kg each - slightly more rigid construction |
Sweet Spot - How forgiving the speaker is of listener position | |
Moderately wide - more flexible placement | Very precise - rewards careful setup |
Room Size Suitability - Critical for matching to your space | |
Better for larger rooms (>300 sq ft) | Ideal for small/medium rooms (<300 sq ft) |
Value Proposition - Overall price/performance assessment | |
80% of Meta's performance at 49% of cost | Ultimate performance at premium price |
For home theater use, the $704 Q350 is often the better choice. Its warmer bass response and more forgiving nature work well with movie content, and the lower price point allows more budget for a subwoofer and center channel. The $1,440 LS50 Meta offers superior detail, but this advantage is less noticeable in home theater applications.
Yes, the KEF Q350 offers exceptional value, delivering about 80% of the LS50 Meta's performance at half the price. They're widely considered one of the best values in high-end audio.
For music, the LS50 Meta can perform well without a subwoofer in smaller rooms. However, for home theater use, a subwoofer is recommended as these speakers roll off below 79Hz.
Yes, both speakers perform best on proper stands despite being "bookshelf" speakers. This ensures optimal sound quality and proper imaging.
Neither speaker is designed for wall mounting. Both perform best on stands away from walls for optimal sound quality.
Both speakers work well for gaming, but the Q350 might be the better choice due to its warmer sound signature and better value, allowing more budget for additional gaming audio components.
We've done our best to create useful and informative comparisons to help you decide what product to buy. Our research uses advanced automated methods to create this comparison and perfection is not possible - please contact us for corrections or questions. These are the sites we've researched in the creation of this article: whatsthebest.co.uk - us.kef.com - youtube.com - perfectacoustic.co.uk - youtube.com - ooberpad.com - ca.kef.com - crutchfield.com - uk.kef.com - snapav.com - erinsaudiocorner.com - musicdirect.com - headphones.com - forum.audiogon.com - whathifi.com - youtube.com - crutchfield.com - us.kef.com - assets.kef.com