When it comes to high-quality bookshelf speakers, few choices generate as much discussion as the contrast between KEF LS50 Meta ($1,500) and Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M ($299). Let's break down everything you need to know to make an informed decision.
Bookshelf speakers remain the sweet spot for many audio enthusiasts, offering a compelling mix of performance and practicality. They're called "bookshelf" speakers because they're compact enough to fit on a shelf, though most serious listeners place them on dedicated stands for better sound.
The primary advantages of bookshelf speakers include:
The KEF LS50 Meta, released in 2020, represents KEF's latest evolution of their acclaimed LS50 line. It introduces Metamaterial Absorption Technology (MAT), which acts like a sound maze to capture and eliminate unwanted sound waves inside the speaker. This technology prevents these waves from coloring the sound you hear, resulting in cleaner, more accurate audio.
The Klipsch RP-500M comes from a different design philosophy. Released in 2018 and updated in 2022 with the II version, it uses Klipsch's signature horn-loaded tweeter design, which helps create an energetic, dynamic sound while making the speaker easier to power.
The LS50 Meta produces what audiophiles call a "neutral" sound - it aims to reproduce music exactly as it was recorded. The Uni-Q driver (where the tweeter sits in the middle of the woofer) creates an incredibly precise soundstage, meaning you can close your eyes and point to where each instrument appears to be playing in the space in front of you.
What's remarkable about the LS50 Meta is how it improves on the original LS50's already excellent performance. The MAT technology notably reduces distortion in the upper frequencies, making long listening sessions more enjoyable. Cymbals and violins sound more natural, with less of the artificial "shine" that many speakers add.
The Klipsch takes a different approach, delivering a more forward, exciting sound. The horn-loaded tweeter (the distinctive copper-colored trumpet shape) projects high frequencies efficiently, creating an immediate, engaging sound that many listeners find energizing.
Bass response is surprisingly robust for a speaker this size, thanks to the Cerametallic woofer (a lightweight but rigid material that helps prevent distortion) and rear port design. The RP-500M can play louder with less power than the KEF, making it an excellent choice for those using moderate-powered amplifiers.
For home theater applications, both speakers have their merits:
The Klipsch RP-500M excels at:
The KEF LS50 Meta offers:
For pure music enjoyment, your choice might depend on your listening preferences:
KEF LS50 Meta suits listeners who:
Klipsch RP-500M better serves those who:
The price difference between these speakers ($1,200) could fund significant upgrades to other parts of your system. With the Klipsch, you could add:
However, the KEF's superior technology and refinement might save money long-term by reducing the urge to upgrade later.
Consider choosing the KEF LS50 Meta if:
The Klipsch RP-500M makes more sense when:
Both speakers represent different approaches to high-fidelity sound reproduction. The KEF LS50 Meta showcases what's possible with modern speaker technology, while the Klipsch RP-500M demonstrates how traditional design principles can deliver outstanding performance at a more accessible price point.
Your choice ultimately depends on your priorities, but either speaker can serve as the foundation of an excellent audio system. If possible, try to audition both - their different characters become immediately apparent when hearing them in person.
| KEF LS50 Meta ($1,500) | Klipsch RP-500M ($299) |
|---|---|
| Sensitivity - Determines how much amplifier power you need | |
| 85 dB (requires more powerful amp) | 93 dB (easy to drive with most amps) |
| Frequency Response - Shows the range of sound the speaker can produce | |
| 79-28,000 Hz (more limited bass) | 48-25,000 Hz (deeper bass extension) |
| Driver Technology - Impacts sound accuracy and dispersion | |
| Uni-Q with MAT (superior imaging, reduced distortion) | Horn-loaded tweeter (dynamic, forward sound) |
| Size - Affects placement flexibility | |
| 11.9" x 7.9" x 11.0" (more compact) | 13.5" x 7.7" x 9.4" (slightly larger) |
| Power Handling - Shows maximum safe volume capability | |
| 40-100W recommended (moderate output) | 75-300W (higher maximum volume) |
| Construction - Impacts resonance and durability | |
| Advanced MAT, cross-braced cabinet (premium build) | Traditional MDF cabinet (standard construction) |
| Off-Axis Performance - How good it sounds when not directly facing listener | |
| Excellent (wider sweet spot) | Good (more directional) |
| Value Proposition - Price vs Performance | |
| Premium price, reference-level performance | Excellent performance at budget price |
For home theater use, the Klipsch RP-500M ($299) offers better value and practicality. Its higher sensitivity makes it easier to power with AV receivers, and its horn-loaded design excels at dialogue clarity. However, the KEF LS50 Meta ($1,500) provides more precise surround effects and better off-axis performance if budget allows.
The KEF LS50 Meta requires 40-100 watts and needs more power due to its 85dB sensitivity. The Klipsch RP-500M is more efficient at 93dB sensitivity and can work well with as little as 50 watts, making it easier to drive with most AV receivers.
The Klipsch RP-500M extends lower to 48Hz compared to the KEF LS50 Meta's 79Hz limit. This means the Klipsch can produce deeper bass naturally, though both speakers benefit from a subwoofer for home theater use.
Both excel at both, but differently. The KEF LS50 Meta offers more precise, refined sound ideal for critical listening. The Klipsch RP-500M provides more dynamic, energetic performance that works especially well for action movies and rock music.
Yes, for home theater use, both speakers should be paired with a subwoofer. While the Klipsch RP-500M has deeper bass extension, neither speaker reaches the low frequencies needed for full home theater impact.
The KEF LS50 Meta is more compact and works exceptionally well in small to medium rooms. The Klipsch RP-500M can work in any size room but may be too powerful for very small spaces.
Both can work as surrounds, but the Klipsch RP-500M is more practical due to its lower cost when buying multiple pairs. The KEF LS50 Meta would make excellent but expensive surrounds.
The Klipsch RP-500M offers exceptional value at $299 per pair. While the KEF LS50 Meta provides superior technology and refinement, its $1,500 price represents a significant premium.
The Klipsch RP-500M's horn-loaded tweeter design typically provides better dialogue clarity, while the KEF LS50 Meta offers more natural vocal reproduction.
The KEF LS50 Meta benefits more from high-quality amplification due to its lower sensitivity. The Klipsch RP-500M is less demanding and works well with most mid-range receivers.
Both are well-built, but the KEF LS50 Meta features more advanced materials and construction. The Klipsch RP-500M uses traditional materials but has a proven track record of reliability.
The Klipsch RP-500M includes keyhole mounting options. The KEF LS50 Meta requires dedicated brackets and is typically used on stands for optimal performance.
We've done our best to create useful and informative comparisons to help you decide what product to buy. Our research uses advanced automated methods to create this comparison and perfection is not possible - please contact us for corrections or questions. These are the sites we've researched in the creation of this article: erinsaudiocorner.com - musicdirect.com - headphones.com - forum.audiogon.com - whathifi.com - youtube.com - crutchfield.com - us.kef.com - assets.kef.com - erinsaudiocorner.com - crutchfield.ca - target.com - bestbuy.com - youtube.com - f072605def1c9a5ef179-a0bc3fbf1884fc0965506ae2b946e1cd.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com - snapav.com - crutchfield.com - d2um2qdswy1tb0.cloudfront.net - youtube.com - sweetwater.com - audioadvisor.com
