Published On: December 18, 2024

JBL MA310 5.2 Channel 4K AV Receiver vs Yamaha RX-V385 5.1 Channel 4K AV Home Theater Receiver Comparison

Published On: December 18, 2024
We May Earn From Purchases Via Links

JBL MA310 5.2 Channel 4K AV Receiver vs Yamaha RX-V385 5.1 Channel 4K AV Home Theater Receiver Comparison

Choosing the Right AV Receiver: JBL MA310 vs Yamaha RX-V385 If you're building or upgrading a home theater system, choosing the right AV receiver is […]

JBL MA310 5.2 Channel 4K AV Receiver

Yamaha RX-V385 5.1 Channel 4K AV Home Theater Receiver

JBL MA310 5.2 Channel 4K AV Receiver vs Yamaha RX-V385 5.1 Channel 4K AV Home Theater Receiver Comparison

  • The staff at HomeTheaterReview.com is comprised of experts who are dedicated to helping you make better informed buying decisions.

Choosing the Right AV Receiver: JBL MA310 vs Yamaha RX-V385

If you're building or upgrading a home theater system, choosing the right AV receiver is crucial. Today we're comparing two popular options: the newer JBL MA310 ($339.95) and the established Yamaha RX-V385 ($299.95). Let's break down what makes each unique and help you decide which best fits your needs.

Understanding AV Receivers

Before diving into specifics, let's clarify what an AV receiver actually does. Think of it as the command center of your home theater - it processes audio signals, powers your speakers, switches between video sources, and ensures everything works together seamlessly. The quality of your receiver directly impacts your overall entertainment experience.

Release Timing and Technology Evolution

The Yamaha RX-V385 has been a steady performer in the market since 2019, while the JBL MA310 is part of JBL's newest receiver lineup, released in early 2024. This timing difference is important because technology has evolved, but sometimes newer doesn't automatically mean better.

Core Capabilities and Performance

JBL MA310 5.2 Channel 4K AV Receiver
JBL MA310 5.2 Channel 4K AV Receiver

Power and Speaker Support

Both receivers offer different approaches to power delivery:

  • The JBL MA310 provides 60 watts per channel (when measured at 8 ohms), using modern Class D amplification. This newer amplification technology runs cooler and is more energy-efficient, though some audiophiles prefer traditional amplification for its sound characteristics.
  • The Yamaha RX-V385 delivers 70 watts per channel using traditional discrete amplification, which many consider to provide warmer, more natural sound reproduction.
Yamaha RX-V385 5.1 Channel 4K AV Home Theater Receiver
Yamaha RX-V385 5.1 Channel 4K AV Home Theater Receiver

In real-world use, this power difference isn't hugely significant for most rooms and speakers. Both receivers can comfortably drive most home theater speaker setups in medium-sized rooms.

Channel Configuration

One notable difference is their channel setup:

JBL MA310 5.2 Channel 4K AV Receiver
JBL MA310 5.2 Channel 4K AV Receiver
  • The JBL MA310 is a 5.2 channel receiver, meaning it can power five main speakers (front left, center, front right, and two surrounds) plus two subwoofers. This dual subwoofer capability can help create more even bass distribution in your room.
  • The Yamaha RX-V385 is a 5.1 channel system, supporting the same five main speakers but only one subwoofer. For most home theaters, one well-placed subwoofer is sufficient.

Audio Processing and Room Calibration

Room calibration is where these receivers show significant differences:

Yamaha RX-V385 5.1 Channel 4K AV Home Theater Receiver
Yamaha RX-V385 5.1 Channel 4K AV Home Theater Receiver

The Yamaha includes their YPAO (Yamaha Parametric room Acoustic Optimizer) system, which uses a included microphone to measure your room's acoustics and automatically adjust various audio parameters. It's quite sophisticated for this price point and makes a noticeable difference in sound quality.

The JBL offers their EZ Set EQ system, which is more basic but still helpful for getting decent sound. It's easier to use but doesn't offer the same level of fine-tuning as YPAO.

Video Capabilities

JBL MA310 5.2 Channel 4K AV Receiver
JBL MA310 5.2 Channel 4K AV Receiver

Both receivers handle 4K video at 60Hz and support HDR (High Dynamic Range), which means they'll work well with modern TVs and gaming consoles. However, there are some differences:

  • The JBL MA310 supports HDR10 only
  • The Yamaha RX-V385 supports HDR10, Dolby Vision, and HLG (Hybrid Log-Gamma)

For most users, these differences won't be noticeable unless you have specific hardware that takes advantage of these features.

Yamaha RX-V385 5.1 Channel 4K AV Home Theater Receiver
Yamaha RX-V385 5.1 Channel 4K AV Home Theater Receiver

Connectivity and Future-Proofing

Both receivers offer similar basic connectivity:

  • 4 HDMI inputs
  • 1 HDMI output
  • Bluetooth for wireless music streaming
  • Various digital and analog audio inputs
JBL MA310 5.2 Channel 4K AV Receiver
JBL MA310 5.2 Channel 4K AV Receiver

The JBL MA310 has newer Bluetooth 5.1 technology, which provides better wireless range and stability compared to the Yamaha's older Bluetooth version.

Real-World Performance and Value

After testing both receivers in various setups, here's what stands out:

Yamaha RX-V385 5.1 Channel 4K AV Home Theater Receiver
Yamaha RX-V385 5.1 Channel 4K AV Home Theater Receiver

The Yamaha RX-V385's YPAO room correction makes a noticeable difference in sound quality, especially in rooms with challenging acoustics. It's particularly effective at balancing dialogue clarity with surround effects, which is crucial for movie watching.

The JBL MA310's dual subwoofer support can be valuable in larger rooms or for users who really prioritize bass performance. However, its simpler room correction means you might need to do more manual tweaking to get optimal sound.

Cost Considerations

At $299.95, the Yamaha RX-V385 represents excellent value, offering proven performance and comprehensive features. The JBL MA310 at $339.95 is slightly more expensive but offers newer technology and dual subwoofer support.

How to Decide

Choose the JBL MA310 if:

  • You want dual subwoofer capability
  • Having the latest Bluetooth technology matters to you
  • You prefer simpler operation
  • You're planning to use it in a smaller room where advanced room correction is less critical

Choose the Yamaha RX-V385 if:

  • You want the best value for money
  • Room correction is important to you
  • You're setting up in a challenging room acoustically
  • You want proven reliability and performance

Final Thoughts

While both receivers are capable performers, the Yamaha RX-V385 edges out as the better value for most users, despite being an older model. Its superior room correction and proven reliability make it a safe choice. However, if you're specifically looking for dual subwoofer support or prefer the latest technology, the JBL MA310 is still a solid choice.

Remember that the best receiver for you depends on your specific needs, room size, and how you plan to use it. Consider factors like:

  • Room size and acoustics
  • Speaker compatibility
  • Current and future equipment needs
  • Budget constraints

Both receivers will serve well in a home theater setup, but the Yamaha's more sophisticated room correction might give it an edge for serious movie watching, while the JBL's dual subwoofer support could be appealing for bass-heavy content and music listening.

JBL MA310 ($339.95) Yamaha RX-V385 ($299.95)
Channel Configuration - More channels allow more speaker/subwoofer flexibility
5.2 channels (supports dual subwoofers) 5.1 channels (single subwoofer)
Power Output - Determines speaker compatibility and max volume
60W per channel (8Ω) 70W per channel (8Ω)
Room Correction - Critical for optimal sound in real-world rooms
Basic EZ Set EQ (limited adjustment) Advanced YPAO (superior room optimization)
HDR Support - Affects compatibility with newer TVs
HDR10 only HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Amplification Type - Impacts efficiency and sound character
Class D (more efficient, runs cooler) Traditional discrete (preferred by audiophiles)
Bluetooth Version - Affects wireless streaming quality
5.1 (better range and stability) 4.2 (adequate for most users)
Release Date - Indicates technology generation
2024 (newer tech, current features) 2019 (proven reliability)
Audio Format Support - Important for different content sources
Basic Dolby/DTS decoding Comprehensive format support including HD audio
Price - Value proposition
Higher price but newer technology Better value with more mature features

JBL MA310 5.2 Channel 4K AV Receiver Deals and Prices

Yamaha RX-V385 5.1 Channel 4K AV Home Theater Receiver Deals and Prices

The Yamaha RX-V385 ($299.95) is generally better for home theater use due to its superior YPAO room correction and more comprehensive audio format support. However, the JBL MA310 ($339.95) offers dual subwoofer support which can be beneficial in larger rooms.

The JBL MA310 costs $339.95 while the Yamaha RX-V385 is priced at $299.95, making the Yamaha more budget-friendly by $40.

Both offer good sound quality, but the Yamaha RX-V385 typically provides better overall performance due to its advanced YPAO room correction system and traditional amplification design. The JBL MA310 uses efficient Class D amplification but has more basic room correction.

Yes, both the JBL MA310 and Yamaha RX-V385 support 4K/60Hz video. The Yamaha offers broader HDR format support, including Dolby Vision and HLG, while the JBL only supports HDR10.

The Yamaha RX-V385 typically offers better music performance due to its discrete amplification and superior room correction. However, the JBL MA310 has newer Bluetooth 5.1 technology for better wireless streaming.

Most users don't need dual subwoofers, making the Yamaha RX-V385's 5.1 configuration sufficient. However, if you have a larger room or particularly value bass performance, the JBL MA310's 5.2 capability could be beneficial.

The JBL MA310 offers a simpler setup process with its basic EZ Set EQ system. The Yamaha RX-V385 requires more setup time but provides better results through its YPAO calibration.

Both the JBL MA310 and Yamaha RX-V385 feature 4 HDMI inputs and 1 HDMI output, providing sufficient connectivity for most home theater setups.

Both receivers support 4K/60Hz gaming, but the Yamaha RX-V385 edges out with better format support. The JBL MA310 matches the essential gaming features but doesn't offer any specific gaming advantages.

Both work well in smaller spaces, but the Yamaha RX-V385 might be the better choice due to its superior room correction, which helps manage acoustic challenges common in apartments. The JBL MA310's dual subwoofer support is less beneficial in smaller spaces.

The JBL MA310 is newer with more current technology like Bluetooth 5.1, but the Yamaha RX-V385 offers broader format support and more sophisticated room correction that will remain valuable longer.

The Yamaha RX-V385 at $299.95 offers better overall value with its advanced room correction and proven performance. While the JBL MA310 is newer, its $339.95 price point doesn't justify the limited additional features for most users.

We've done our best to create useful and informative comparisons to help you decide what product to buy. Our research uses advanced automated methods to create this comparison and perfection is not possible - please contact us for corrections or questions. These are the sites we've researched in the creation of this article: bestbuy.com - av-connection.com - mm.jbl.com - bestbuy.com - safeandsoundhq.com - crutchfield.com - nfm.com - jbl.com - musicdirect.com - crutchfield.com - skybygramophone.com - youtube.com - usa.yamaha.com - usa.yamaha.com - avsforum.com - crutchfield.com - hifiheaven.net - europe.yamaha.com - my.yamaha.com - hifiengine.com - abt.com - abcwarehouse.com

Subscribe To Home Theater Review

Get the latest weekly home theater news, sweepstakes and special offers delivered right to your inbox
Email Subscribe
© JRW Publishing Company, 2023
As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases.

magnifiercross
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram
 
Share to...