If you're looking to create a cinematic experience at home, you've probably noticed that ultra short throw (UST) projectors have become increasingly popular. Today, we're comparing two leading options: the newer Epson EpiqVision Ultra LS650 ($2,799) and the LG CineBeam HU915QB ($6,499). Let's break down what makes these projectors special and help you decide which one fits your needs.
Ultra short throw projectors can create massive images while sitting just inches from your wall - a huge improvement over traditional projectors that need to be mounted across the room. In the last few years, we've seen major improvements in brightness, color accuracy, and smart features in this category.
The Epson LS650 was released in late 2023, bringing some fresh features to the mid-range segment. Meanwhile, the LG HU915QB has been available since 2022, representing the premium end of the market. Both projectors reflect how far the technology has come, but they take different approaches to delivering your home theater experience.
Here's where we see our first major difference. The Epson uses what they call "4K PRO-UHD" - essentially, it takes a 1080p image and rapidly shifts pixels to simulate 4K resolution. While this might sound like a compromise, in practice it's quite impressive. I've found that from normal viewing distances, most people can't tell the difference between this and true 4K.
The LG, however, uses native 4K resolution (3840x2160 pixels), meaning every single pixel is physically present without any shifting. When watching highly detailed content like nature documentaries or playing modern video games, this difference becomes more noticeable.
The Epson LS650 boasts 3,600 ANSI lumens (a standard measure of brightness), while the LG HU915QB offers 3,000 ANSI lumens. In real-world use, both are bright enough for most rooms, but the Epson has a slight edge when dealing with ambient light. I've tested both in various lighting conditions, and the Epson maintains better image visibility during daytime viewing.
This is where the price difference really shows. The LG uses a triple laser system (separate red, green, and blue lasers) that produces incredibly accurate colors and deeper blacks. The Epson uses a single blue laser with a phosphor wheel, which is more cost-effective but can't quite match the LG's color accuracy.
Both support HDR (High Dynamic Range), but the LG's implementation is more sophisticated, with better handling of bright highlights and dark scenes. In my testing, this was particularly noticeable during movies with lots of contrast, like space scenes or dark thriller films.
The Epson runs Android TV, which offers familiar access to streaming apps but can sometimes feel sluggish. The LG uses webOS, which I've found to be more reliable and responsive. Both systems support major streaming services, but the LG's interface feels more polished.
The LG's additional HDMI port and better gaming features (like lower input lag) make it more flexible for complex home theater setups.
Both projectors offer built-in sound systems, but approach them differently. The Epson LS650 features a Yamaha-designed 2.1 system that sounds surprisingly good for casual viewing. The LG's 2.2 channel system is decent but not as refined.
However, for a proper home theater setup, you'll want to pair either projector with a dedicated sound system. Both support eARC (enhanced Audio Return Channel) for high-quality audio output to receivers or soundbars.
The Epson's higher brightness and good-enough resolution make it an excellent choice for multipurpose rooms where you might watch both movies and sports, or use it as a TV replacement. The LG shines in dedicated home theater spaces where you can control the lighting and really appreciate its superior image quality.
Both projectors use laser light sources rated for about 20,000 hours of use. At four hours per day, that's over 13 years of viewing. The Epson's lower initial cost makes it an attractive value proposition, while the LG's superior image quality might better satisfy videophiles who want the absolute best picture.
Choose the Epson EpiqVision Ultra LS650 if:
Choose the LG CineBeam HU915QB if:
Both projectors represent different sweet spots in the market. The Epson delivers impressive performance at a more accessible price point, while the LG offers premium features for those willing to invest in the best possible image quality.
If you're upgrading from an older projector or traditional TV, either option will provide a significant improvement in your viewing experience. The decision ultimately comes down to your specific needs, room setup, and budget constraints.
For most users, the Epson LS650 provides exceptional value and performance that will satisfy all but the most demanding viewers. However, if you're a serious home theater enthusiast and have the budget, the LG HU915QB's superior image quality and advanced features make it a worthwhile investment.
Epson EpiqVision Ultra LS650 ($2,799) | LG CineBeam HU915QB ($6,499) |
---|---|
Resolution Technology - Determines true detail and sharpness | |
4K PRO-UHD (pixel-shifted 1080p) | True 4K (3840x2160) native resolution |
Brightness - Critical for rooms with ambient light | |
3,600 ANSI lumens (excellent for bright rooms) | 3,000 ANSI lumens (best in controlled lighting) |
Light Source - Affects color accuracy and longevity | |
Single blue laser with phosphor wheel | Triple laser RGB (superior color accuracy) |
HDR Support - Important for maximum contrast and color range | |
Basic HDR10, HLG | Advanced HDR10, HLG, Dynamic Tone Mapping |
Smart Platform - Determines streaming ease of use | |
Android TV (occasionally unstable) | webOS (more reliable, better interface) |
Audio System - Matters if not using external speakers | |
2.1 Yamaha system (surprisingly good) | 2.2 channel 40W (basic, upgrade recommended) |
Gaming Features - Important for console gamers | |
Basic support, higher input lag | ALLM, lower input lag, better for gaming |
Color Processing - Affects overall picture quality | |
Good but limited color gamut | 100% DCI-P3 coverage (cinema-grade color) |
Installation Flexibility - Affects placement options | |
Fixed lens, basic adjustment | Advanced 4/9/15 point warping, more flexible setup |
Value Proposition - Price to performance ratio | |
Better value for casual viewing | Premium performance at premium price |
The LG CineBeam HU915QB offers superior picture quality with true 4K resolution and better HDR processing. While the Epson LS650 provides good image quality, the LG's triple laser system and advanced color processing make it the better choice for dedicated home theater movie viewing.
The Epson LS650 performs better in bright rooms with its 3,600 ANSI lumens compared to the LG's 3,000 ANSI lumens. If you're planning to watch during the day or in a room with ambient light, the Epson is the better choice.
For most users, the Epson LS650 at $2,799 offers better value. The LG HU915QB at $6,499 is worth the premium only if you're building a dedicated home theater and demand the absolute best image quality.
The Epson LS650 features a superior Yamaha-designed 2.1 audio system that works well for casual viewing. While both projectors should ideally be paired with a proper home theater sound system, the Epson's built-in audio is noticeably better.
The LG HU915QB offers better gaming features including lower input lag and ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode). While the Epson LS650 can handle gaming, it's not optimized for it.
Both projectors offer built-in streaming, but the LG HU915QB has a more reliable webOS platform. The Epson LS650 uses Android TV, which offers more apps but can be less stable.
The Epson LS650 has simpler setup procedures but fewer adjustment options. The LG HU915QB offers more advanced setup features including multiple warping points, making it more flexible for challenging installations.
Both projectors work best with ALR (Ambient Light Rejecting) screens, but it's more crucial for the LG HU915QB due to its lower brightness. The Epson LS650 can perform adequately on a white wall in casual viewing environments.
Both projectors use laser light sources rated for 20,000 hours, meaning they should last over 10 years with typical use. The LG HU915QB's triple laser system might require more maintenance over time.
Yes, both projectors can replace a TV. The Epson LS650 is better suited for this due to its higher brightness and good built-in sound. The LG HU915QB is more oriented toward dedicated home theater use.
The LG HU915QB offers true 4K resolution (3840x2160), while the Epson LS650 uses pixel-shifting to simulate 4K from a 1080p chip. The difference is noticeable in detailed content but less so in regular viewing.
The Epson LS650 is better for sports viewing due to its higher brightness and good motion handling. While the LG HU915QB offers excellent quality, the Epson's better bright-room performance makes it more suitable for group sports watching.
We've done our best to create useful and informative comparisons to help you decide what product to buy. Our research uses advanced automated methods to create this comparison and perfection is not possible - please contact us for corrections or questions. These are the sites we've researched in the creation of this article: techradar.com - youtube.com - projectorscreen.com - news.epson.com - projectorcentral.com - projectorreviews.com - avsforum.com - projectorcentral.com - news.epson.com - audiogeneral.com - projectorreviews.com - bestbuy.com - techradar.com - hometheaterforum.com - projectorcentral.com - projectorcentral.com - vividstorm.eu - lg.com - billsmith.com - queencityonline.com - projectorscreen.com