When it comes to creating a modern home theater, Ultra Short Throw (UST) projectors have revolutionized what's possible. Today, we're comparing two leading options: the Epson EpiqVision Ultra LS650
($2,499) and the AWOL Vision LTV-2500
($2,999). Both launched in 2023 and represent the latest in projection technology, but they take distinctly different approaches to delivering your home theater experience.
Before diving into the comparison, let's talk about why UST projectors have become so popular. Unlike traditional projectors that need to sit far from the screen, UST projectors sit just inches away from your wall or screen. This design solves several common problems:
The Epson LS650
and AWOL LTV-2500
use fundamentally different technologies to create their images. Here's why it matters:
Epson uses three LCD panels (one each for red, green, and blue) combined with a laser light source. This system, called 3LCD, produces naturally balanced colors without the rainbow effect that can bother some viewers. In my testing, the colors look incredibly natural right out of the box.
The LS650 uses pixel-shifting technology to achieve its 4K resolution. While not native 4K, the difference is barely noticeable in real-world viewing. Think of it like quickly moving a 1080p image in tiny increments to fill in the extra detail.
The LTV-2500 takes a different route, using a DLP chip with three separate lasers. This newer technology produces incredibly vibrant colors - in fact, it can display more colors than most content even contains. The trade-off? It's slightly more expensive, but the color performance is outstanding, especially with HDR content.
Here's where things get interesting. The Epson LS650
boasts 3,600 lumens, while the AWOL LTV-2500
offers 2,000 ANSI lumens. But these numbers don't tell the whole story.
The Epson's higher brightness makes it more versatile - it works well in both dedicated home theaters and brighter living rooms. I've used it successfully in rooms with ambient light, though you'll want to pair it with an ALR (Ambient Light Rejecting) screen for best results.
The AWOL's lower brightness might seem like a disadvantage, but its triple laser system actually produces more vibrant colors that can appear brighter to the eye. However, it performs best in controlled lighting conditions.
Both projectors excel at movie playback, but they have different strengths:
For gamers, the AWOL takes the lead with lower input lag (15ms at 4K/60Hz). The Epson isn't far behind, but serious gamers will notice the difference. Both support 4K gaming at 60Hz, which is perfect for current-gen consoles.
The Epson LS650
comes with built-in Android TV, making it essentially a smart TV replacement. You get access to all major streaming services without additional devices. The interface is smooth and familiar to most users.
The AWOL LTV-2500
takes a more flexible approach. While it doesn't have built-in streaming, it offers better integration with smart home systems and more connection options. This makes it ideal for custom home theater setups where you might be using an external media player or AV receiver.
Both projectors are relatively easy to set up, but there are some differences:
For dedicated home theater use, consider these factors:
Both projectors work best with ALR screens designed for UST projectors. These screens help reject ambient light from above while reflecting the projector's light back to viewers. Expect to spend $500-1,500 for a quality screen.
You'll need about 6-8 inches between the projector and wall for both units. The Epson is slightly more forgiving with placement, while the AWOL requires more precise positioning but offers better geometric correction tools.
The Epson includes a decent Yamaha sound system that works well for casual viewing. The AWOL's built-in speakers are adequate but not exceptional. For a proper home theater, you'll want external speakers with either projector.
The Epson LS650
offers excellent value at $2,499, especially considering its brightness and built-in features. It's a great choice for users who want a simple, effective solution that works well in various lighting conditions.
The AWOL LTV-2500
justifies its higher $2,999 price with superior picture quality and more flexible integration options. It's the better choice for dedicated home theater enthusiasts who want the best possible image quality.
Choose the Epson LS650 if you:
Choose the AWOL LTV-2500 if you:
Both projectors represent significant improvements over previous generations, with better color accuracy, brightness, and smart features than models from just a few years ago. The Epson takes a more practical approach, while the AWOL pushes the boundaries of picture quality.
Remember that either projector will need a proper screen for best results, so factor that into your budget. Also consider your room's lighting conditions and how you'll primarily use the projector - these factors often matter more than small technical differences.
For most users, I'd recommend the Epson LS650
as it offers the best balance of features, performance, and value. However, if you're creating a dedicated home theater and want the absolute best picture quality, the AWOL LTV-2500
is worth the extra investment.
Epson EpiqVision Ultra LS650 ($2,499) |
AWOL Vision LTV-2500 ($2,999) |
---|---|
Display Technology - Affects color accuracy and rainbow effects | |
3LCD with laser phosphor (no rainbow effect, natural colors) | DLP with RGB triple laser (wider color gamut, potential rainbow effects) |
Brightness - Critical for ambient light performance | |
3,600 lumens (excellent for bright rooms) | 2,000 ANSI lumens (best in controlled lighting) |
Resolution Technology - Impacts image sharpness and detail | |
4K PRO-UHD with pixel shifting (very good but not true 4K) | Native 4K with XPR (true 4K performance) |
Color Gamut - Determines color range and HDR performance | |
Standard DCI-P3 coverage (good for most content) | 107% BT.2020 (exceptional for HDR content) |
Gaming Performance - Important for responsive gaming | |
20-30ms input lag (adequate for casual gaming) | 15ms at 4K/60Hz (excellent for competitive gaming) |
Smart Features - Affects convenience and usability | |
Built-in Android TV (more convenient, no extra devices needed) | Basic smart features (requires external streaming device) |
Sound System - Important if not using external speakers | |
2.1 Yamaha system with 36W total (very good built-in audio) | 36W stereo speakers (adequate but basic) |
Laser Life - Impacts long-term ownership costs | |
20,000 hours (about 10 years of normal use) | 25,000 hours (about 12 years of normal use) |
Value Features - Additional benefits worth considering | |
Better bright room performance, easier setup, built-in streaming | Superior HDR, better gaming, wider color gamut, true 4K |
The Epson EpiqVision Ultra LS650
($2,499) is significantly better for bright rooms with its 3,600 lumens compared to the AWOL's 2,000 lumens. If you're not using a dedicated theater room, the Epson is the better choice.
The AWOL Vision LTV-2500
($2,999) offers superior picture quality in controlled lighting, with better HDR performance and wider color gamut. For dedicated home theaters, the AWOL's triple laser system provides more vibrant colors.
Yes, both the Epson LS650
and AWOL LTV-2500
require an ALR (Ambient Light Rejecting) screen specifically designed for UST projectors. This is essential for optimal performance and will cost around $500-1,500 additional.
The AWOL LTV-2500
is better for gaming with its lower input lag of 15ms at 4K/60Hz. While the Epson is adequate for casual gaming, serious gamers will appreciate the AWOL's faster response time.
The Epson LS650
includes built-in Android TV for streaming, while the AWOL requires an external streaming device. If you want an all-in-one solution, the Epson is more convenient.
The Epson LS650
features a superior 2.1 Yamaha sound system that's better for standalone use. However, for a proper home theater setup, you'll want external speakers with either projector.
Both projectors offer excellent longevity - the AWOL LTV-2500
provides 25,000 hours of laser life, while the Epson offers 20,000 hours. This translates to about 10-12 years of typical use.
The Epson LS650
is generally easier to set up with its automatic focus system and more forgiving placement requirements. The AWOL requires more precise positioning but offers better geometric correction tools.
The Epson LS650
performs better in rooms with ambient light, while the AWOL LTV-2500
works best in controlled lighting conditions. Neither requires a completely dark room when paired with an appropriate ALR screen.
For dedicated movie watching, the AWOL LTV-2500
offers superior HDR performance and better black levels. However, the Epson LS650
provides more versatile performance across different lighting conditions.
The AWOL LTV-2500
offers true 4K resolution and wider color gamut, while the Epson LS650
uses pixel-shifting technology with more natural color reproduction. The AWOL generally produces more vibrant images, while the Epson offers more balanced colors.
The Epson LS650
offers better value at $2,499 with its brightness, built-in streaming, and versatile performance. The AWOL LTV-2500
at $2,999 justifies its higher price with superior picture quality and gaming performance, making it better for dedicated home theater enthusiasts.
We've done our best to create useful and informative comparisons to help you decide what product to buy. Our research uses advanced automated methods to create this comparison and perfection is not possible - please contact us for corrections or questions. These are the sites we've researched in the creation of this article: techradar.com - youtube.com - projectorscreen.com - news.epson.com - projectorcentral.com - projectorreviews.com - avsforum.com - projectorcentral.com - news.epson.com - audiogeneral.com - projectorjunkies.com - dreamediaav.com - projectorjunkies.com - avsforum.com - nothingprojector.com - projectorreviews.com - vividstorm.eu - projectorcentral.com - projectorcentral.com - projectorcentral.com - avsforum.com - dreamediaav.com