When it comes to bookshelf speakers, the gap between entry-level and premium options can be vast. Today we're comparing the high-end Bowers & Wilkins 707 S2 ($959) with the budget-friendly Polk Audio Monitor XT15 ($199) to help you understand what you get at different price points and who should consider each option.
Bookshelf speakers remain a popular choice for both music and home theater, offering a compelling balance of performance and space efficiency. While soundbars have dominated the market lately, traditional speakers still provide superior sound quality and flexibility for serious listeners.
These two models represent different approaches to bookshelf speaker design. The B&W 707 S2, released in 2017, showcases premium technologies that have trickled down from their flagship 800 Series Diamond line. The Polk XT15, a more recent 2022 release, focuses on delivering maximum value while incorporating some modern features like Hi-Res certification.
The B&W 707 S2 delivers exceptional detail and accuracy, thanks to its Carbon Dome tweeter (a stiff, lightweight dome that can reproduce frequencies up to 47kHz without distorting). This results in remarkably clear highs and precise imaging - meaning you can easily pinpoint where instruments are positioned in the soundstage. The Continuum cone (B&W's proprietary woven material) handles midrange frequencies with a natural, uncolored sound that's especially noticeable with vocals and acoustic instruments.
The Polk XT15 takes a different approach with its Terylene dome tweeter and bi-laminate paper cone woofer. While it can't match the B&W's resolution, it produces an engaging sound with prominent highs and respectable bass. The treble can be somewhat bright, especially with poorly recorded material, but most listeners will find it energetic and detailed for the price point.
B&W's Flowport technology (a dimpled port design that reduces turbulence) helps the 707 S2 produce controlled, accurate bass down to 50Hz. While you won't get subwoofer-level lows, the bass quality is exceptional - tight, detailed, and well-integrated with the overall sound.
The Polk XT15 actually extends slightly lower on paper to 48Hz, but the quality of that bass is different. It's more prominent but less controlled, which can be fun for movies and modern music but might not satisfy purists. However, the XT15's higher sensitivity (86dB vs 84dB) means it's easier to drive with modest amplification.
This is where the price difference becomes most apparent. The 707 S2's advanced drivers and careful engineering create a expansive, three-dimensional soundstage that extends well beyond the speakers' physical locations. Individual instruments and voices are precisely placed within this space, creating an immersive listening experience.
The Polk XT15 presents a more conventional soundstage that's primarily between the speakers. While it can certainly fill a room with sound, the spatial presentation is less precise and immersive. This might not matter for casual listening but becomes noticeable with well-recorded classical music or movie soundtracks.
The B&W 707 S2 is relatively demanding of amplification. Its 84dB sensitivity and 4-ohm minimum impedance mean it needs a quality amplifier delivering 30-100 watts per channel. You won't get the best from these speakers with a budget receiver.
The Polk XT15 is more forgiving, working well with anything from basic receivers to separate amplifiers. Its 86dB sensitivity and 8-ohm impedance make it an easier load to drive, though it can handle up to 150 watts for those with more powerful amps.
Both speakers benefit from proper placement, but the 707 S2 is more sensitive to positioning. It needs at least 50cm from walls and performs best on rigid stands. The included foam port plugs allow fine-tuning of bass response for different room positions.
The XT15 is more flexible, working reasonably well in various positions including wall mounting via its keyhole mount. While careful placement will improve performance, it's less critical than with the B&W.
The 707 S2 showcases premium materials throughout - from its rigid cabinet with multiple finishes to its high-end binding posts and carefully engineered crossover components. These speakers are built to last decades with proper care.
The XT15 is well-built for its price point, with a solid MDF cabinet and decent quality terminals. While it may not have the same long-term durability as the B&W, it's certainly capable of providing many years of service.
The key question is whether the B&W's performance advantages justify its significantly higher price. For critical listeners and those building high-end systems, the answer is often yes. The 707 S2's superior resolution, imaging, and refinement are immediately apparent in good systems.
However, the Polk XT15 delivers remarkable performance for its price point. For many listeners, especially those using modest electronics or primarily watching movies and casual music listening, the XT15 represents better value.
Consider these key factors when choosing between these speakers:
The B&W 707 S2 and Polk XT15 represent different but valid approaches to bookshelf speaker design. The 707 S2 showcases what's possible when cost is less constrained, while the XT15 demonstrates how much performance can be achieved on a budget. Choose based on your specific needs, system context, and long-term audio goals.
Bowers & Wilkins 707 S2 ($959) | Polk Audio Monitor XT15 ($199) |
---|---|
Frequency Response - Determines overall sound range and accuracy | |
50Hz - 28kHz (±3dB), extremely accurate | 48Hz - 40kHz (no tolerance specified) |
Sensitivity - How much power needed from amplifier | |
84dB, requires powerful amp | 86dB, easier to drive |
Power Handling - Safe operating range with amplifier | |
30W - 100W, needs quality amplification | 30W - 150W, more flexible |
Impedance - Affects amplifier compatibility | |
8Ω nominal (4Ω minimum), demanding load | 8Ω nominal, easier load |
Driver Configuration - Key components for sound reproduction | |
1" Carbon Dome tweeter, 5" Continuum cone | 1" Terylene dome tweeter, 5.25" bi-laminate paper cone |
Cabinet Size - Important for placement flexibility | |
11" x 6.5" x 10.2", compact but deep | 10.6" x 6.6" x 7.2", slightly smaller depth |
Weight - Affects stability and cabinet resonance | |
13.2 lbs each, substantial build | 9 lbs each, lighter construction |
Special Features - Additional benefits | |
Flowport technology, bi-wire capable, premium finishes | Hi-Res certified, wall-mountable, basic black finish |
Warranty - Long-term value protection | |
5 years, transferable | 5 years |
Build Quality - Durability and aesthetics | |
Premium materials, advanced driver tech | Good quality basics, standard construction |
Primary Use Case - Best application | |
Critical listening, high-end systems | Casual listening, budget home theater |
Both the Bowers & Wilkins 707 S2 ($959) and Polk Audio Monitor XT15 ($199) work well in small rooms. The Polk XT15 is slightly more flexible for placement, while the B&W offers superior sound quality if you can maintain proper speaker positioning.
The B&W 707 S2 requires a high-quality amplifier (30-100W) for optimal performance. The Polk XT15 is more forgiving and works well with most receivers or amplifiers.
The B&W 707 S2 offers superior music reproduction with better detail, imaging, and accuracy. The Polk XT15 provides good musical performance for casual listening but lacks the refinement of the B&W.
Both work well for home theater. The Polk XT15 offers excellent value for movie watching, while the B&W 707 S2 provides more precise dialogue and effects placement.
The B&W 707 S2 offers tighter, more controlled bass down to 50Hz. The Polk XT15 reaches 48Hz but with less precision and control.
For full-range music and movie performance, both speakers benefit from a subwoofer. However, both can perform well without one for casual listening in smaller rooms.
The B&W 707 S2 features premium build quality and materials for long-term durability. The Polk XT15 is well-built for its price but uses more basic materials.
The Polk XT15 includes wall-mounting capability. The B&W 707 S2 is designed for stand or shelf placement only.
Both perform well with streaming services. The B&W 707 S2 will reveal more detail in high-quality streams, while the Polk XT15 is more forgiving with compressed audio.
The B&W 707 S2 justifies its higher price for critical listeners and high-end systems. For casual listening, the Polk XT15 offers excellent value at a fraction of the cost.
Room brightness doesn't affect speaker performance. Both the B&W 707 S2 and Polk XT15 perform equally well regardless of room lighting.
Both speakers benefit from break-in. The B&W 707 S2 typically needs 20-30 hours, while the Polk XT15 requires about 10-15 hours to reach optimal performance.
We've done our best to create useful and informative comparisons to help you decide what product to buy. Our research uses advanced automated methods to create this comparison and perfection is not possible - please contact us for corrections or questions. These are the sites we've researched in the creation of this article: whathifi.com - safeandsoundhq.com - bestbuy.com - hifichoice.com - crutchfield.com - listenup.com - digitalcinema.com.au - worldradiohistory.com - youtube.com - frankstonhifi.com.au - bestbuy.com - bestbuy.com - audiosciencereview.com - crutchfield.com - audiolab.com - bombayaudio.com - parts-express.com - erinsaudiocorner.com - bhphotovideo.com - au.polkaudio.com - bestbuy.com - polkaudio.com