When you're ready to step into serious audio quality, the $900-1000 bookshelf speaker range offers some compelling choices. Today we're comparing two standout options: the Bowers & Wilkins 707 S2 ($959) and the KEF LS50 Meta ($899), each bringing unique technologies and approaches to sound reproduction.
Both speakers represent significant technological advancement in their respective product lines. The B&W 707 S2, released in 2019, brought the company's high-end Continuum cone technology to a more accessible price point. This woven composite material, which replaced B&W's famous yellow Kevlar cones, provides more natural breakup behavior - meaning when the driver reaches its limits, it does so more gracefully than traditional materials.
The KEF LS50 Meta, launched in 2021, builds upon the original 2012 LS50 design that revolutionized what was possible from a small speaker. The Meta version introduces Metamaterial Absorption Technology (MAT), which uses a complex maze-like structure to absorb 99% of unwanted sound behind the tweeter. Think of it as an acoustic black hole that prevents distortion-causing reflections from bouncing back through the driver.
The 707 S2 presents music with authority and weight that seems impossible from its compact size. Its Carbon Dome tweeter (which pushes the first breakup mode to 47kHz, well beyond human hearing) delivers airy, extended highs without becoming harsh. The Continuum cone handles midrange duties with remarkable clarity, making vocals and acoustic instruments sound notably natural.
In contrast, the LS50 Meta takes a more neutral, analytical approach. Its MAT technology creates an incredibly clean, distortion-free top end that reveals previously unnoticed details in familiar recordings. The unified sound field created by KEF's Uni-Q driver (where the tweeter sits in the center of the midrange cone) produces extremely coherent sound with precise imaging.
This is where these speakers show their different design philosophies. The 707 S2 creates a wide, expansive soundstage that extends beyond the speaker boundaries. Instruments are well-separated and easily locatable, though the depth of the soundstage is good rather than exceptional.
The LS50 Meta's Uni-Q driver creates a more focused, precise image with superior depth perception. The "sweet spot" (ideal listening position) is larger, making it more forgiving of listener position. This can be particularly valuable in real-world living rooms where optimal speaker placement isn't always possible.
Despite similar driver sizes (5.25" for KEF, 5" for B&W), these speakers handle bass quite differently. The 707 S2 reaches deeper (-6dB at 45Hz vs KEF's 79Hz) and produces more impactful low frequencies. This makes it more suitable for music genres that depend on bass energy, like electronic music or rock.
The LS50 Meta's bass is tighter and more controlled, though it doesn't reach as low. It's more about precision than impact, which suits acoustic music and vocal performances particularly well. For home theater use, both speakers would benefit from a subwoofer, though the 707 S2 might integrate more seamlessly due to its lower extension.
Room size significantly impacts speaker choice. The 707 S2 has more dynamic capability and works better in medium to large rooms. Its rear-firing Flowport (B&W's name for their flared bass port) needs some space from walls but is relatively forgiving about exact placement.
The LS50 Meta shines in small to medium rooms where its precise imaging and controlled bass work to greatest effect. Its port design is more sensitive to placement, but the speaker includes foam plugs to tune the bass response for different positions.
Neither speaker is particularly easy to drive. The 707 S2 has 84dB sensitivity and recommends 30-100 watts, while the LS50 Meta rates at 85dB and suggests 40-100 watts. In practice, both benefit from high-quality amplification with good current delivery. This isn't just about volume - better amplification helps maintain control and detail at all listening levels.
While both speakers excel with music, they have different strengths for home theater use. The 707 S2's deeper bass extension and higher dynamic capability make it more suitable for movie effects and dramatic swings in volume. It's also part of B&W's 700 series, making it easier to build a timbre-matched surround system.
The LS50 Meta's precise imaging and wider sweet spot can create a more immersive soundfield, particularly valuable for dialogue and atmospheric effects. However, its more limited bass means a subwoofer is practically required for movie use.
At their respective price points ($959 for the 707 S2, $899 for the LS50 Meta), both speakers represent excellent value but in different ways. The 707 S2 offers technologies derived from B&W's flagship 800 series at a fraction of the price. The LS50 Meta brings genuinely innovative technology and exceptional imaging precision at a compelling price point.
Choose the B&W 707 S2 if you:
Choose the KEF LS50 Meta if you:
Both speakers represent the cutting edge of what's possible in compact speaker design, just with different priorities and approaches. The 707 S2 favors impact and engagement, while the LS50 Meta prioritizes precision and clarity. Your room size, listening preferences, and intended use should guide your choice between these excellent performers.
Bowers & Wilkins 707 S2 | KEF LS50 Meta |
---|---|
Price - Core consideration for value assessment | |
$959/pair | $899/pair |
Bass Extension - Determines need for subwoofer | |
-6dB at 45Hz (deeper, more impactful) | -3dB at 79Hz (tighter but less extended) |
Sensitivity - Impacts amplifier power needs | |
84dB (requires robust amplification) | 85dB (slightly easier to drive) |
Recommended Amp Power - Critical for matching components | |
30-100W into 8Ω | 40-100W into 8Ω |
Driver Configuration - Affects sound coherence | |
Traditional separate tweeter/woofer | Uni-Q concentric driver array |
Key Technology - Main engineering innovation | |
Carbon Dome tweeter, Continuum cone | Metamaterial Absorption Technology (MAT) |
Dimensions (HxWxD) - Room placement consideration | |
11.0" x 6.5" x 10.2" | 11.8" x 7.9" x 11.0" |
Weight - Impacts stand requirements | |
13.2 lbs each | 17.2 lbs each |
Ideal Room Size - Critical for performance | |
Medium to large rooms | Small to medium rooms |
Sound Signature - Personal preference factor | |
Fuller, warmer, more dynamic | Neutral, precise, highly detailed |
Available Finishes - Aesthetic considerations | |
Gloss Black, Satin White, Rosenut | Carbon Black, Titanium Grey, Mineral White, Royal Blue |
The B&W 707 S2 and KEF LS50 Meta each excel in different areas. The 707 S2 offers better bass extension and dynamics, while the LS50 Meta provides superior imaging and detail. Your choice should depend on room size and listening preferences.
The KEF LS50 Meta costs $899/pair, while the B&W 707 S2 is priced at $959/pair, making them very competitive in the same price bracket.
The KEF LS50 Meta is ideal for small to medium rooms due to its controlled bass and precise imaging. The 707 S2 typically performs better in larger spaces.
The B&W 707 S2 has better bass extension (-6dB at 45Hz) compared to the LS50 Meta (-3dB at 79Hz). While both would benefit from a subwoofer for home theater use, the 707 S2 can perform better without one for music.
The KEF LS50 Meta has slightly higher sensitivity at 85dB compared to the 707 S2's 84dB. Both speakers need quality amplification in the 40-100 watt range for optimal performance.
The B&W 707 S2 has an advantage for home theater due to better bass extension and dynamic range. However, both speakers would benefit from a subwoofer for proper home theater performance.
Both speakers feature excellent build quality. The KEF LS50 Meta uses innovative MAT technology and premium materials, while the 707 S2 features B&W's proven Carbon Dome tweeter and Continuum cone technology.
The KEF LS50 Meta is better suited for desk (near-field) listening due to its Uni-Q driver design and more precise imaging. The 707 S2 generally performs better with more space between the speaker and listener.
The B&W 707 S2 typically produces a wider soundstage, while the LS50 Meta offers more precise imaging and depth.
Yes, both speakers perform best on proper stands. They're designed as true bookshelf/stand-mount speakers and need proper placement for optimal performance.
The KEF LS50 Meta features newer technology with its MAT system, while the 707 S2 uses more traditional but well-proven technologies. Both are likely to remain relevant and satisfying for many years.
We've done our best to create useful and informative comparisons to help you decide what product to buy. Our research uses advanced automated methods to create this comparison and perfection is not possible - please contact us for corrections or questions. These are the sites we've researched in the creation of this article: whathifi.com - safeandsoundhq.com - bestbuy.com - hifichoice.com - crutchfield.com - listenup.com - digitalcinema.com.au - worldradiohistory.com - youtube.com - frankstonhifi.com.au - erinsaudiocorner.com - musicdirect.com - headphones.com - forum.audiogon.com - whathifi.com - youtube.com - crutchfield.com - us.kef.com - assets.kef.com