Bookshelf speakers remain the versatile sweet spot for many audio enthusiasts, offering remarkable sound quality while being practical for most living spaces. They're essentially scaled-down versions of floor-standing speakers, designed to deliver high-quality sound from a compact enclosure that can fit on a shelf, stand, or desk.
The Bowers & Wilkins 606 S3 and Polk Reserve R100 represent two distinct approaches to bookshelf speaker design, each bringing unique innovations to the table. Let's dive into what makes these speakers special and how they compare across key areas that matter most to listeners.
The B&W 606 S3's new Titanium Dome tweeter represents a significant upgrade from previous models. This tweeter design, which floats in a gel-like suspension, delivers exceptionally clear high frequencies without harshness. In practice, this means you'll hear more detail in complex musical passages - think being able to distinguish individual instruments in an orchestra more easily.
The Polk R100's Pinnacle Ring Radiator tweeter takes a different approach, focusing on wider sound dispersion. This means you don't have to sit in the exact "sweet spot" to get good sound, making it more practical for casual listening and home theater use where multiple people are listening from different positions.
Both speakers excel in the crucial midrange frequencies where most vocals and instruments live, but they do it differently:
Despite their compact size, both speakers handle bass impressively:
The 606 S3 reaches down to 52Hz, which is impressive for its size. Its rear-firing port design can actually enhance bass response when properly positioned near a wall. However, this makes placement more critical - too close to the wall and the bass becomes boomy, too far and it thins out.
The R100's X-Port technology (a specially designed port that reduces turbulence) provides more consistent bass performance regardless of placement. While it doesn't reach quite as low (58Hz), the bass it does produce is more even and controlled across different positions in the room.
Both speakers deserve quality amplification, but they have different requirements:
The 606 S3 has an 88dB sensitivity rating, meaning it needs a bit more power to reach the same volume levels as more efficient speakers. Plan on using an amplifier in the 50-100 watt range for best results. The speaker really shines with high-quality amplification - I've found it scales up nicely with better equipment.
The R100 is slightly less sensitive at 86dB but handles a wider range of amplifier power (30-150W). In practice, it's more forgiving with modest amplifiers while still benefiting from higher-end equipment. This makes it a more flexible choice for various system configurations.
Here's where the practical differences become significant:
The 606 S3's rear-firing port design means you'll need to experiment with placement. Generally, start with the speakers about 8-12 inches from the wall and adjust from there. They also benefit from being slightly toed-in (angled toward the listening position).
The R100 is notably more flexible thanks to its X-Port design. You can place these speakers closer to walls without significantly compromising sound quality. This flexibility makes them particularly well-suited for real-world living spaces where optimal placement isn't always possible.
The price difference between these speakers ($451) is significant enough to warrant careful consideration:
The 606 S3 represents B&W's latest technology, including their new Titanium Dome tweeter and refined Continuum cone material. These improvements over the previous S2 model deliver noticeable performance benefits, particularly in detail retrieval and high-frequency clarity.
The R100 leverages technology from Polk's higher-end Legend series, offering exceptional value. The speaker's versatility and forgiving nature make it a practical choice that you're likely to enjoy long-term, even as other components in your system change.
Both speakers excel in home theater applications, but with different strengths:
The 606 S3's precise imaging and detail retrieval make it excellent for movie dialogue and complex soundtracks. However, you'll need to carefully consider placement due to the rear-porting design.
The R100's wider dispersion pattern and more flexible placement options make it particularly well-suited for home theater use. The consistent off-axis performance means everyone in the room gets good sound, not just the person in the center seat.
Choose the B&W 606 S3 if:
Choose the Polk Reserve R100 if:
Both speakers represent excellent choices in their respective price points. The B&W 606 S3 pushes the boundaries of what's possible in a bookshelf speaker, delivering exceptional detail and resolution for critical listening. The Polk R100 offers tremendous value and versatility, making it the more practical choice for many users.
Consider that the price difference could be invested in other system components or room treatment, which might ultimately yield better overall results than stretching for the more expensive speaker. Whatever your choice, both represent significant improvements over previous generations and demonstrate how far bookshelf speaker technology has advanced.
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S3 ($1,100) | Polk Reserve R100 ($649) |
---|---|
Frequency Response - Determines bass depth and overall range | |
52-28,000 Hz - Deeper bass extension | 58-39,000 Hz - Higher treble extension |
Sensitivity - Impacts how much amplifier power is needed | |
88dB - Moderately efficient | 86dB - Requires more power |
Driver Configuration - Affects sound quality and imaging | |
1" Titanium Dome tweeter + 6.5" Continuum cone | 1" Pinnacle Ring Radiator + 5.25" Turbine Cone |
Power Handling - Determines amplifier compatibility | |
30-120W - More restricted range | 30-150W - More flexible range |
Impedance - Affects amplifier compatibility | |
8 ohms - Easy to drive | 8 ohms - Easy to drive |
Dimensions (HxWxD) - Important for placement planning | |
13.7" x 7.5" x 13" - Larger cabinet | 12.8" x 6.6" x 10.2" - More compact |
Weight - Affects mounting options and stability | |
15.5 lbs each - Substantial build | 12.2 lbs each - More manageable |
Port Design - Impacts placement flexibility | |
Rear-firing Flowport - Requires space behind speakers | X-Port technology - More flexible placement |
Special Features - Distinguishing technologies | |
Decoupled tweeter, Continuum cone technology | Pinnacle Ring Radiator, Turbine cone design |
Warranty - Long-term value protection | |
5 years - Excellent coverage | 5 years - Excellent coverage |
The B&W 606 S3 ($1,100) offers more detailed and analytical sound, making it superior for critical music listening. However, the Polk Reserve R100 ($649) provides a warmer, more forgiving sound that works well with a wider variety of music sources and recording qualities.
The B&W 606 S3 reaches slightly lower (52Hz vs 58Hz) and provides more impactful bass, but requires careful placement. The Polk R100's X-Port technology delivers more consistent bass regardless of placement.
Both speakers benefit from quality amplification, but the Polk R100 is more forgiving with modest amplifiers. The B&W 606 S3 tends to perform best with higher-end amplification.
The Polk Reserve R100 is generally better suited for home theater due to its wider dispersion pattern and more flexible placement options. The B&W 606 S3 offers excellent detail but requires more careful setup.
The Polk R100 offers better value at $649, providing excellent performance for the price. The B&W 606 S3 at $1,100 delivers superior sound quality but requires a larger investment in associated equipment to reach its full potential.
The Polk R100 is significantly easier to position thanks to its X-Port design. The B&W 606 S3's rear-firing port requires more careful placement away from walls.
The Polk R100 is more forgiving with varying streaming quality. The B&W 606 S3 reveals more detail but can expose flaws in lower-quality streams.
Both speakers are well-built, but the B&W 606 S3 features slightly more premium materials and finishing touches. The Polk R100 is still very well constructed for its price point.
Both speakers are suitable for small rooms, but the Polk R100's more flexible placement makes it easier to optimize in space-constrained settings.
Both the B&W 606 S3 and Polk Reserve R100 come with 5-year warranties, providing equivalent long-term protection.
Neither speaker is designed for wall mounting. Both perform best on stands or solid surfaces away from walls, though the Polk R100 is more tolerant of near-wall placement.
The B&W 606 S3 offers more detail and clarity in vocals, while the Polk R100 provides a warmer, more natural presentation that many listeners find pleasing.
We've done our best to create useful and informative comparisons to help you decide what product to buy. Our research uses advanced automated methods to create this comparison and perfection is not possible - please contact us for corrections or questions. These are the sites we've researched in the creation of this article: futureaudiophile.com - headphones.com - therobinsonbrand.com - higherhz.com - audioadvisor.com - crutchfield.com - bowerswilkins.com - crutchfield.com - vinylrevival.com.au - audioadvisor.com - worldwidestereo.com - polkaudio.com - crutchfield.com - audioadvisor.com - forum.polkaudio.com - forums.whathifi.com - listenup.com - audioadvisor.com - polkaudio.com - youtube.com - audioadvisor.com