The world of premium bookshelf speakers has evolved significantly in recent years, with manufacturers pushing the boundaries of what's possible in compact enclosures. Today, we're comparing two standout models: the recently released (2024) Bowers & Wilkins 606 S3 at $1,100 per pair and the Martin Logan Motion B10 at $970 per pair.
Before diving into specifics, let's understand what makes today's high-end bookshelf speakers special. Both manufacturers take different approaches to solving the eternal challenge of reproducing accurate sound from relatively small cabinets.
The B&W 606 S3 represents the latest evolution of their acclaimed 600 series, incorporating technology that previously was only found in their more expensive lines. The Motion B10 showcases Martin Logan's innovative folded motion tweeter technology, which handles high frequencies differently than traditional dome tweeters.
The B&W 606 S3 creates a precisely focused soundstage where instruments and vocals are locked in specific positions. This precision comes from their new Titanium dome tweeter and Continuum cone technology, which helps eliminate unwanted resonances that can blur the sound image.
The Motion B10's folded motion tweeter creates an impressively wide soundstage that often extends beyond the physical speaker placement. This can make music feel more expansive and room-filling, though with slightly less precise positioning than the B&Ws.
Here's where the speakers show their different design philosophies. The 606 S3's titanium dome tweeter and Continuum cone midrange driver deliver exceptional detail - you'll hear subtle nuances like fingers sliding on guitar strings or the natural decay of cymbal hits. However, this revealing nature means poor recordings or compressed streaming audio will have nowhere to hide.
The Motion B10 takes a more forgiving approach. While still detailed, its folded motion tweeter produces a smoother, more relaxed presentation that can make long listening sessions particularly enjoyable. It's less likely to expose flaws in recordings, which could be a benefit depending on your music collection.
Despite their compact size, both speakers handle lower frequencies admirably, though differently. The 606 S3 reaches slightly deeper (52Hz vs 56Hz), but more importantly, its 6.5-inch Continuum cone driver provides better control and definition in the bass region. This makes it more suitable for use without a subwoofer.
The Motion B10's 5.5-inch woven fiberglass driver produces tight, clean bass but doesn't quite match the impact or extension of the B&W. For home theater use or bass-heavy music, you might want to consider adding a subwoofer to the Motion B10 system.
This is an area where the speakers differ significantly. The Motion B10's higher sensitivity (92dB vs 88dB) means it needs less power to play at the same volume. It's also more amplifier-friendly, working well with everything from budget receivers to high-end amplifiers.
The 606 S3 is more demanding. While its nominal 8-ohm impedance is easier on amplifiers than the Motion B10's 5 ohms, it needs more power to shine. You'll want at least 50 watts per channel of clean power to hear what these speakers can really do.
Speaker placement can significantly impact performance. The 606 S3's rear-firing port means it needs some space behind it to breathe - ideally at least 8-12 inches from walls. Get this right, and you'll be rewarded with deeper, more articulate bass.
The Motion B10 is more forgiving of placement, though like all speakers, it still benefits from careful positioning. Its controlled dispersion pattern helps minimize problematic room reflections, making it easier to achieve good sound in less-than-ideal spaces.
The B&W 606 S3 represents a significant investment at $1,100, but it delivers technology previously only found in much more expensive speakers. The build quality is exceptional, and the speakers should provide many years of enjoyment.
The Motion B10 at $970 offers excellent value, especially if you prioritize a smooth, fatigue-free listening experience. Its more forgiving nature might make it a better match for a wider range of systems and rooms.
Consider your priorities and listening environment:
Remember that both speakers are excellent performers in their price range. The best choice depends on matching their characteristics to your specific needs and preferences.
For home theater use, the B&W's deeper bass extension might give it an edge for 2.0 setups, but if you're planning a full surround system with a subwoofer, the Motion B10's wider dispersion could create a more immersive experience.
Both speakers represent different approaches to high-end sound reproduction, each with its own strengths. The B&W 606 S3 excels at revealing every detail in your music, while the Motion B10 offers a more forgiving, room-friendly presentation. Your choice should ultimately depend on your listening preferences, room characteristics, and associated equipment.
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S3 ($1,100/pair) | Martin Logan Motion B10 ($970/pair) |
---|---|
Sensitivity - Determines how much amplifier power is needed | |
88dB - Needs more powerful amp | 92dB - Works well with modest amplification |
Frequency Response - Indicates bass depth and overall range | |
52Hz - 28kHz - Better bass extension | 56Hz - 25kHz - May need subwoofer support |
Power Handling - Shows amplifier compatibility range | |
30-120 watts - More demanding | 20-200 watts - More flexible range |
Driver Configuration - Affects sound character | |
1" Titanium dome tweeter, 6.5" Continuum cone | Gen2 Folded Motion tweeter, 5.5" fiberglass cone |
Impedance - Impacts amplifier compatibility | |
8 ohms - Easier load for amplifiers | 5 ohms - More challenging load |
Cabinet Design - Affects bass performance and placement | |
Rear-ported - Needs space from walls | Rear-ported - More placement flexible |
Dimensions (HxWxD) - Consider space requirements | |
13.7" x 7.5" x 13" - Larger cabinet | 12.5" x 7" x 9.75" - More compact |
Weight - Important for stand/shelf consideration | |
15.5 lbs each - More substantial | 14.5 lbs each - Slightly lighter |
Bi-wiring Capability - Offers upgrade flexibility | |
Yes - Dual binding posts | No - Single wire only |
Sound Character - Overall listening experience | |
Detailed, analytical, precise imaging | Smooth, wider soundstage, more forgiving |
The B&W 606 S3 offers more detail and precision for music, with better bass extension. However, the Martin Logan Motion B10 provides a smoother, more forgiving sound that some listeners prefer for long sessions. Both are excellent for music, but the B&W edges ahead for critical listening.
The B&W 606 S3 is less sensitive (88dB vs 92dB) and needs more power. Plan on at least 50 watts per channel for the B&Ws, while the Motion B10s can perform well with as little as 20 watts.
The B&W 606 S3 reaches deeper bass (52Hz) and can work well without a subwoofer for music. The Motion B10 may benefit more from a subwoofer, especially for home theater use or bass-heavy music.
The Martin Logan Motion B10 is more compact and generally more flexible with placement, making it better suited for smaller spaces. The B&W 606 S3 needs more room to breathe, especially behind the speakers.
Both offer strong value - the B&W 606 S3 at $1,100/pair delivers higher-end technology, while the Motion B10 at $970/pair provides excellent performance with more forgiving characteristics.
The B&W 606 S3 offers bi-wiring capability and higher resolution performance, potentially making it more future-proof. However, the Motion B10's more efficient design might be more practical for long-term use with various equipment.
The Martin Logan Motion B10 is more suitable for budget receivers due to its higher sensitivity. The B&W 606 S3 really needs a quality amplifier to perform its best.
Both are well-built, but the B&W 606 S3 has a slight edge in build quality with its more premium materials and finish options.
Both work well in home theater systems. The B&W 606 S3 offers better bass for two-channel setups, while the Motion B10's wider dispersion can create a more immersive surround experience.
Yes, both the B&W 606 S3 and Motion B10 perform best on proper speaker stands, ideally placing the tweeters at ear level.
The Martin Logan Motion B10 is more forgiving of lower-quality recordings and streaming services. The B&W 606 S3 is more revealing of recording flaws.
Both are built to last 10+ years with proper care. The B&W 606 S3 comes with a 5-year warranty, reflecting its long-term durability, while the Motion B10 is similarly well-built for longevity.
We've done our best to create useful and informative comparisons to help you decide what product to buy. Our research uses advanced automated methods to create this comparison and perfection is not possible - please contact us for corrections or questions. These are the sites we've researched in the creation of this article: futureaudiophile.com - headphones.com - therobinsonbrand.com - higherhz.com - audioadvisor.com - crutchfield.com - bowerswilkins.com - crutchfield.com - vinylrevival.com.au - audioadvisor.com - worldwidestereo.com - audiosciencereview.com - crutchfield.com - audiojunction.com.au - bestbuy.com - audioadvice.com - safeandsoundhq.com - dreamediaav.com - crutchfield.com - nfm.com - audioadvisor.com