When it comes to high-quality bookshelf speakers, the $550 Bowers & Wilkins 606 S3 and $234 Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M II represent two different philosophies in speaker design. Let's explore how these speakers compare and what makes each special for different types of listeners.
Bookshelf speakers remain the sweet spot for many music lovers, offering an excellent balance of performance and practicality. They're versatile enough to serve as main speakers in smaller rooms or as high-quality surrounds in a home theater setup. Unlike floor-standing speakers, they can be positioned on stands or shelves, making them ideal for apartments or rooms where space is at a premium.
The B&W 606 S3, released in late 2023, represents the latest evolution of B&W's acclaimed 600 series. The most significant upgrade is the new Titanium Dome tweeter, which borrows technology from their premium 700 and 800 series speakers. This tweeter uses a lightweight titanium dome that moves more precisely than previous aluminum versions, resulting in clearer high frequencies and better detail.
The Klipsch RP-500M II, launched in 2022, builds upon Klipsch's traditional strengths while addressing some criticisms of earlier models. The redesigned Tractrix horn (a specially shaped waveguide that helps control how sound spreads into the room) now offers wider, more even dispersion, meaning you don't have to sit in exactly the right spot to get good sound.
Both speakers handle bass differently, which significantly impacts their overall sound. The B&W's 6.5-inch Continuum cone woofer (a special composite material developed by B&W) produces tight, accurate bass that extends down to 52Hz. This means you'll hear most music's fundamental notes, though the lowest bass in electronic music or pipe organs would benefit from a subwoofer.
The Klipsch uses a similarly sized Cerametallic woofer (aluminum with a ceramic coating), reaching slightly lower to 50Hz. However, the Klipsch tends to sound more impactful and dynamic in the bass region, which can be exciting for rock and pop music but might not be as strictly accurate for classical recordings.
This is where these speakers show their different design philosophies most clearly. The 606 S3 presents voices and instruments with remarkable neutrality. Its Continuum cone, developed through years of research, avoids the slight colorations that can make speakers sound obviously "speakery." Listening to acoustic music or vocal performances through the B&Ws can be revelatory – you hear the natural timbre of instruments and voices without artificial emphasis.
The RP-500M II takes a more dramatic approach. Its horn-loaded tweeter and dynamic woofer create an engaging, forward presentation that makes music feel more immediate. Voices are pushed slightly forward in the mix, and instruments have added presence. While not strictly neutral, many listeners find this presentation more exciting, especially for rock and pop music.
Both speakers handle high frequencies expertly but in distinct ways. The B&W's titanium dome tweeter, decoupled from the cabinet to prevent vibration interference, delivers smooth, extended highs with excellent detail. You'll hear the shimmer of cymbals and the air around instruments without any harshness.
Klipsch's horn-loaded tweeter design, a company hallmark for over 75 years, projects high frequencies with remarkable efficiency. This creates a sense of immediacy and detail that can be thrilling, though some listeners might find it slightly aggressive on bright recordings.
Here's where the differences become practical. The Klipsch RP-500M II is notably more efficient (92dB sensitivity) compared to the B&W 606 S3 (88dB sensitivity). In real terms, this means the Klipsch needs less amplifier power to play at the same volume. A modest 50-watt receiver will drive them easily, while the B&Ws benefit from more powerful, higher-quality amplification.
The B&Ws are more particular about placement, requiring some space behind them for their rear-firing ports to work properly. They also benefit from careful positioning and toe-in (angling toward the listening position) to sound their best. The Klipsch speakers are more forgiving, thanks to their horn design, which controls sound dispersion more effectively.
Both speakers can excel in home theater applications, but their characteristics suggest different roles. The Klipsch's higher sensitivity and dynamic character make them excellent for movie soundtracks, where sudden impacts and explosive effects benefit from their punchy presentation. The B&Ws might be better suited for someone who watches lots of dialogue-driven content or uses their system primarily for music with occasional movie duty.
At $234, the Klipsch represents exceptional value, delivering engaging sound and solid build quality at a price that's hard to beat. The B&W's $550 price tag requires more justification, but their refined sound quality and premium construction make them worth considering for critical listeners who prioritize accuracy over impact.
Choose the Klipsch RP-500M II if you:
Choose the B&W 606 S3 if you:
For most people, the Klipsch offers better value and easier integration into existing systems. However, if absolute sound quality is your priority and you have the associated equipment to match, the B&Ws represent the more refined choice. Their ability to disappear into the music while revealing every detail makes them worth the premium for discerning listeners.
Remember, both speakers represent significant improvements over their predecessors and either choice will provide years of musical enjoyment when properly matched with your system and preferences.
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S3 | Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M II |
---|---|
Price - Key factor in value proposition | |
$550/pair (premium pricing tier) | $234/pair (mid-tier pricing) |
Sensitivity - Determines how much amplifier power is needed | |
88dB (requires more powerful amp) | 92dB (works well with modest amps) |
Frequency Response - Indicates bass extension and overall range | |
52Hz-28kHz ±3dB (slightly more extended highs) | 50Hz-25kHz ±3dB (similar bass reach) |
Woofer Design - Affects bass quality and midrange accuracy | |
6.5" Continuum cone (neutral, accurate) | 5.25" Cerametallic cone (punchy, dynamic) |
Tweeter Technology - Impacts high-frequency detail and dispersion | |
1" Titanium dome (refined, detailed) | 1" Horn-loaded titanium (dynamic, efficient) |
Power Handling - Shows maximum safe amplification | |
30-120W recommended (needs quality power) | 75W/300W cont/peak (more efficient) |
Impedance - Affects amplifier compatibility | |
8 ohms nominal (amp-friendly) | 8 ohms compatible (amp-friendly) |
Cabinet Size - Important for room placement | |
13.7"H x 7.5"W x 13"D (larger) | 13.56"H x 6.81"W x 10.65"D (more compact) |
Weight - Affects stability and cabinet rigidity | |
15.5 lbs each (substantial build) | 13.1 lbs each (solid construction) |
Port Design - Impacts placement flexibility | |
Rear Flowport (needs space from walls) | Rear Tractrix port (more placement-friendly) |
Warranty - Indicates manufacturer confidence | |
5 years (excellent coverage) | 3 years (industry standard) |
The $550 B&W 606 S3 offers more neutral, accurate sound reproduction ideal for acoustic and classical music. The $234 Klipsch RP-500M II provides more dynamic, exciting performance better suited for rock and pop music.
The B&W 606 S3 requires 30-120 watts and benefits from higher quality amplification. The Klipsch RP-500M II is more efficient at 92dB sensitivity, working well with modest amplifiers from 50-75 watts.
Both reach similar low frequencies (B&W: 52Hz, Klipsch: 50Hz), but have different characters. The 606 S3 offers tighter, more controlled bass while the RP-500M II provides punchier, more prominent bass response.
Yes, both work well in home theaters. The Klipsch RP-500M II excels with dynamic movie soundtracks due to higher sensitivity, while the B&W 606 S3 offers more refined performance for balanced movie/music use.
The Klipsch RP-500M II is more compact and placement-friendly, making it better for small rooms. The 606 S3 needs more space from walls due to its rear port design.
For critical listeners with quality amplification who prioritize accuracy, the 606 S3 justifies its premium price. For most users, the RP-500M II offers better value at less than half the cost.
The Klipsch RP-500M II works well with budget receivers due to its high sensitivity. The B&W 606 S3 requires more power and benefits from better amplification.
Both are well-built, but the 606 S3 offers a longer 5-year warranty compared to the RP-500M II's 3-year coverage, suggesting greater long-term durability.
For full-range music and movie performance, both speakers benefit from a subwoofer. Neither reaches below 50Hz effectively on their own.
The B&W 606 S3 reproduces vocals with more natural accuracy, while the Klipsch RP-500M II presents them with more forward presence and excitement.
The Klipsch RP-500M II is more forgiving with near-wall placement. The 606 S3 needs more space from walls for optimal performance due to its rear port design.
Both perform well with streaming, but the RP-500M II is more forgiving of compressed audio sources, while the 606 S3 reveals more detail in high-quality streams.
We've done our best to create useful and informative comparisons to help you decide what product to buy. Our research uses advanced automated methods to create this comparison and perfection is not possible - please contact us for corrections or questions. These are the sites we've researched in the creation of this article: futureaudiophile.com - headphones.com - therobinsonbrand.com - higherhz.com - audioadvisor.com - crutchfield.com - bowerswilkins.com - crutchfield.com - vinylrevival.com.au - audioadvisor.com - worldwidestereo.com - erinsaudiocorner.com - safeandsoundhq.com - audioadvice.com - youtube.com - crutchfield.com - klipsch.com - youtube.com - d2um2qdswy1tb0.cloudfront.net - abt.com - crutchfield.com - klipsch.com - audioadvisor.com