When stepping into the world of high-end bookshelf speakers, two models frequently come up in conversation: the Bowers & Wilkins 606 S3 ($550/pair) and the KEF LS50 Meta ($900/pair). Both represent different approaches to achieving exceptional sound quality, but they're aimed at slightly different listeners. Let's dive deep into what makes each special and help you decide which might be right for your setup.
Bookshelf speakers have come a long way from being simple two-way boxes. Today's models incorporate advanced materials and sophisticated engineering that would have seemed like science fiction just a decade ago. The KEF LS50 Meta arrived in late 2020, introducing groundbreaking Metamaterial Absorption Technology (MAT), while the B&W 606 S3 launched in 2023 as part of B&W's refreshed 600 series lineup.
The LS50 Meta's headline feature is its MAT technology - essentially a complex maze-like structure that absorbs 99% of unwanted sound from the back of the tweeter. This might sound like marketing speak, but the difference is audible in the form of cleaner, more precise high frequencies.
KEF's Uni-Q driver array, now in its 12th generation, places the tweeter in the center of the midrange cone. This creates what's called a "point-source" speaker, meaning all frequencies appear to come from the same spot. The result? Incredibly precise imaging and a much larger sweet spot - that ideal listening position where everything sounds perfect.
The 606 S3 takes a more conventional approach but executes it brilliantly. The Continuum cone (which replaced B&W's famous yellow Kevlar) handles midrange and bass duties, while the Titanium dome tweeter manages the highs. The speakers feature B&W's "decoupled dome" technology, where the tweeter is physically separated from the cabinet to reduce unwanted vibrations.
Here's where the design philosophies really show their colors. The LS50 Meta creates an almost holographic soundstage - instruments and voices appear to float in specific locations between and around the speakers. It's eerily precise.
The 606 S3 presents a more traditional but still excellent stereo image. While it might not match the pin-point precision of the KEF, it often creates a more relaxed, room-filling sound that many listeners find more natural for long-term listening.
The 606 S3's larger 6.5-inch driver and bigger cabinet give it a natural advantage in bass response, reaching down to 52Hz compared to the LS50 Meta's 79Hz. This difference is noticeable - the B&Ws can produce satisfying bass with most music without a subwoofer, while the KEFs might leave bass-heads wanting more.
The LS50 Meta showcases incredible detail retrieval. Voices are presented with stunning clarity, and you can hear subtle details like fingers sliding on guitar strings or the ambience of recording venues. The MAT technology really proves its worth here, delivering clean, extended highs without any harshness.
The 606 S3 offers a slightly warmer, more forgiving presentation. While still detailed, it's less likely to expose flaws in poor recordings. This makes it more versatile across different genres and recording qualities.
This is an important practical consideration. The 606 S3's higher sensitivity (88dB vs 85dB) means it needs less power to reach the same volume levels. The LS50 Meta is more demanding - you'll want a high-quality amplifier capable of delivering clean power to get the best performance.
Both speakers excel in home theater settings but in different ways. The 606 S3's more robust bass response makes it an excellent choice for smaller systems without a subwoofer. The LS50 Meta's precise imaging helps create an incredibly immersive soundstage, particularly beneficial for complex movie soundtracks.
If you're building a complete system, both manufacturers offer matching center channels and surrounds. The 606 S3's higher sensitivity might be advantageous for home theater use, as AV receivers typically aren't as powerful as dedicated stereo amplifiers.
At $550/pair, the 606 S3 represents excellent value. You get:
The $900 LS50 Meta justifies its higher price with:
Choose the B&W 606 S3 if:
Choose the KEF LS50 Meta if:
Both speakers represent different approaches to high-end sound reproduction, and both excel at what they do. The B&W 606 S3 offers tremendous value and a more forgiving nature, while the KEF LS50 Meta pushes the boundaries of what's possible in a bookshelf speaker, albeit at a higher price point.
Remember, the best speaker is the one that makes your music sound the way you want it to. If possible, try to audition both speakers with your favorite music before making a decision. Your ears and personal preferences should be the final judge.
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S3 ($550/pair) | KEF LS50 Meta ($900/pair) |
---|---|
Price Point - Total investment required | |
$550/pair - Excellent value for performance | $900/pair - Premium pricing reflects advanced technology |
Driver Configuration - Affects sound cohesion and imaging | |
Traditional 2-way with separate 6.5" woofer and 1" tweeter | Uni-Q coaxial array with 5.25" woofer and 1" tweeter |
Sensitivity - Determines amplifier power needs | |
88dB - Works well with modest amplifiers | 85dB - Requires more powerful amplification |
Frequency Response - Indicates bass capability | |
52Hz-28kHz - Better natural bass extension | 79Hz-28kHz - May benefit from subwoofer addition |
Recommended Amp Power - Impacts system matching | |
30-120W - Flexible amplifier matching | 40-100W - More demanding of amplifier quality |
Special Technologies - Key engineering advantages | |
Continuum cone and Titanium dome tweeter | Metamaterial Absorption Technology (MAT) and 12th gen Uni-Q |
Sweet Spot - Affects listening position flexibility | |
Traditional stereo image with standard sweet spot | Wider sweet spot due to coaxial driver design |
Cabinet Size - Room placement considerations | |
7.5"W x 13.7"H x 13"D - Larger cabinet | 7.9"W x 11.8"H x 11"D - More compact design |
Weight - Installation and shelf considerations | |
15.5 lbs each - Standard for size | 17.2 lbs each - Heavier despite smaller size |
Warranty - Long-term value protection | |
5 years - Excellent coverage | 5 years - Industry standard coverage |
The B&W 606 S3 ($550/pair) offers better value and deeper bass, while the KEF LS50 Meta ($900/pair) provides superior detail and imaging. Neither is definitively "better" - it depends on your preferences and budget.
The KEF LS50 Meta costs $900/pair, while the B&W 606 S3 is $550/pair, making it $350 less expensive.
The B&W 606 S3 reaches lower bass (52Hz) and can work well without a subwoofer. The KEF LS50 Meta's bass limit (79Hz) means you might want a subwoofer for full-range sound.
Both work well in home theater setups. The B&W 606 S3 offers better bass and is easier to drive with AV receivers, while the KEF LS50 Meta provides superior dialog clarity and precise sound placement.
The B&W 606 S3 (88dB sensitivity) works well with modest amplifiers. The KEF LS50 Meta (85dB sensitivity) benefits more from higher-quality amplification.
The KEF LS50 Meta's smaller size and wider sweet spot make it ideal for small rooms. The B&W 606 S3 might be better suited to medium or larger spaces.
Yes, both perform excellently with streaming. The KEF LS50 Meta reveals more detail in high-quality streams, while the B&W 606 S3 is more forgiving with lower-quality sources.
Both the B&W 606 S3 and KEF LS50 Meta are well-built and come with 5-year warranties. Both brands have excellent reputations for longevity.
Neither is designed specifically for wall-mounting. Both perform best on stands or solid surfaces away from walls.
Both excel with vinyl. The KEF LS50 Meta's detail retrieval highlights vinyl's warmth, while the B&W 606 S3's more forgiving nature works well with older records.
No, both speakers work well with standard speaker cables. However, they both feature high-quality binding posts that can accept premium cables if desired.
The KEF LS50 Meta offers a wider sweet spot thanks to its Uni-Q driver design, making it better for multiple listeners. The B&W 606 S3 has a more traditional listening window.
We've done our best to create useful and informative comparisons to help you decide what product to buy. Our research uses advanced automated methods to create this comparison and perfection is not possible - please contact us for corrections or questions. These are the sites we've researched in the creation of this article: futureaudiophile.com - headphones.com - therobinsonbrand.com - higherhz.com - audioadvisor.com - crutchfield.com - bowerswilkins.com - crutchfield.com - vinylrevival.com.au - audioadvisor.com - worldwidestereo.com - erinsaudiocorner.com - musicdirect.com - headphones.com - forum.audiogon.com - whathifi.com - youtube.com - crutchfield.com - us.kef.com - assets.kef.com