The home theater projector market has evolved dramatically in recent years, with ultra short throw (UST) laser projectors emerging as compelling alternatives to massive TVs. Today we're comparing two leading options: the BenQ V5010i and Epson EpiqVision Ultra LS800, both priced around $3,000.
UST projectors can create massive 100"+ images while sitting just inches from your wall - a revolutionary change from traditional projectors that needed significant mounting distance. Both these models represent the latest generation of this technology, released in late 2022, and showcase how far we've come with brightness, color accuracy, and smart features.
The biggest advancement has been in laser light sources, which offer instant on/off capability, consistent brightness over their 20,000+ hour lifespan, and better color reproduction compared to traditional lamp-based projectors. They're also more energy efficient and run cooler.
The Epson LS800 boasts an impressive 4,000 lumens using their 3LCD technology, which splits light into red, green, and blue components that recombine for the final image. This approach delivers equal color and white brightness - important for vibrant images in well-lit rooms.
The BenQ V5010i outputs 2,500 lumens using DLP technology with a color wheel. While lower on paper, DLP can sometimes appear brighter due to how it processes light. However, in real-world testing, the Epson clearly performs better in rooms with ambient light.
I've tested both units in various lighting conditions, and the Epson's extra brightness makes a noticeable difference during daytime viewing. The BenQ demands more light control for optimal performance, though it excels in darker environments.
The BenQ takes the lead in color accuracy, covering 98% of the DCI-P3 color space (the standard used for digital cinema) and comes factory calibrated. It uses sophisticated color processing that results in exceptionally natural skin tones and vivid yet accurate colors.
The Epson manages about 77% of DCI-P3. While still good, it can't match the BenQ's color precision. However, many viewers might prefer the Epson's punchier, more saturated look for casual viewing.
Both projectors claim a 2,500,000:1 dynamic contrast ratio, but these numbers can be misleading. In practical use, the BenQ's superior black levels become apparent in dark scenes, showing more detail in shadows and creating a more cinematic image. The Epson compensates somewhat with its higher brightness, which can make contrast appear more dramatic in ambient light.
Gaming has become a crucial consideration for projectors, and here the Epson clearly leads. Its 16.7ms input lag is remarkably low for a projector, making it suitable for all but the most competitive gaming. It also supports 1080p at 120Hz through one of its HDMI ports.
The BenQ wasn't designed with gaming as a priority, showing noticeably more input lag. While fine for casual gaming or slower-paced titles, competitive gamers should lean toward the Epson.
Both projectors run Android TV, providing access to most major streaming services. However, the BenQ lacks Netflix certification - a notable omission requiring workarounds like connecting an external streaming device.
The Epson's implementation feels more polished, with better app support and smoother navigation. Both offer voice control through Google Assistant, but the Epson's newer Android TV version provides a more refined experience.
These projectors take different approaches to built-in audio. The Epson partners with Yamaha for a 2.1 system with dedicated subwoofer, while the BenQ offers a 40W system with separate tweeters and woofers.
In testing, both systems impress for built-in audio, though neither matches a dedicated home theater setup. The Epson's subwoofer gives it slightly better bass response, while the BenQ offers clearer dialogue.
UST projectors require precise placement for optimal image alignment. Both offer digital keystone correction and corner adjustment, but the BenQ's Auto Screen Fit feature makes initial setup notably easier.
The Epson's shorter throw ratio (0.17:1 vs 0.25:1) means it can sit closer to the wall for the same image size, potentially making furniture placement easier.
At similar price points, these projectors target different users. The Epson LS800 offers better brightness-per-dollar and gaming performance, while the BenQ V5010i delivers superior color accuracy and black levels.
Consider the Epson if:
Choose the BenQ if:
Both projectors represent the current state of the art in UST technology, but they approach it differently. The Epson emphasizes versatility and brightness, while the BenQ focuses on image quality and color accuracy. Future models will likely continue pushing brightness levels higher while improving color performance and gaming capabilities.
As prices for these technologies continue to drop, UST projectors are becoming increasingly compelling alternatives to large-format TVs, offering similar convenience with much larger possible screen sizes.
The choice between these two excellent projectors ultimately comes down to your specific needs and viewing environment. For most users, the Epson's versatility makes it the safer choice, but home theater enthusiasts with controlled lighting will appreciate the BenQ's superior image quality.
BenQ V5010i 4K Laser Projector | Epson EpiqVision Ultra LS800 3LCD Laser Projector |
---|---|
Brightness - Critical for room lighting flexibility | |
2,500 ANSI lumens (best for controlled lighting) | 4,000 ANSI lumens (excellent for bright rooms) |
Display Technology - Impacts color accuracy and rainbow effects | |
DLP with color wheel (better black levels, potential rainbow effect) | 3LCD (no rainbow effect, consistent color brightness) |
Color Gamut - Determines color richness and accuracy | |
98% DCI-P3 (superior color accuracy) | 77% DCI-P3 (good but less precise) |
Input Lag - Critical for gaming performance | |
~60ms (adequate for casual gaming) | 16.7ms (excellent for most gaming) |
Throw Ratio - Determines installation distance | |
0.25:1 (needs ~5.5" per 100" screen) | 0.17:1 (needs ~4" per 100" screen) |
Built-in Audio - Important if not using external speakers | |
40W system (5Wx2 tweeters + 15Wx2 woofers) | 20W Yamaha speakers + 10W subwoofer |
Smart Features - Affects content access | |
Android TV (no Netflix certification) | Android TV (full streaming support) |
HDR Support - Impacts dynamic range | |
HDR10+, HDR10, HLG with dynamic tone mapping | HDR10, HLG with basic tone mapping |
Light Source Lifespan - Long-term reliability | |
20,000 hours laser life | 20,000 hours laser life |
Price - Value consideration | |
$2,999 (better for dedicated home theater) | $2,999 (better for versatile use) |
The Epson LS800 is significantly brighter at 4,000 lumens compared to the BenQ V5010i's 2,500 lumens. This makes the Epson better for rooms with ambient light.
The Epson LS800 is superior for gaming with its 16.7ms input lag and 120Hz support. The BenQ V5010i has higher input lag, making it less suitable for competitive gaming.
The BenQ V5010i offers superior color accuracy with 98% DCI-P3 coverage compared to the Epson LS800's 77%. The BenQ also comes factory calibrated.
Yes, both run Android TV, but the BenQ V5010i lacks Netflix certification. The Epson LS800 offers full streaming app support.
The BenQ V5010i is better for movie watching in controlled lighting due to superior black levels and color accuracy. The Epson LS800 performs better in brighter rooms.
Both the BenQ V5010i and Epson LS800 use laser light sources rated for 20,000 hours of use.
Both have good audio systems - the Epson LS800 features Yamaha speakers with a subwoofer, while the BenQ V5010i has a 40W system. They're comparable in quality.
The Epson LS800 performs much better in daylight due to its 4,000 lumens brightness. The BenQ V5010i requires more controlled lighting conditions.
Both projectors work best with ALR (ambient light rejecting) screens, but it's especially important for the BenQ V5010i due to its lower brightness.
The BenQ V5010i has better auto-alignment features, but the Epson LS800 can be placed closer to the wall due to its shorter throw ratio.
Both projectors are priced similarly at around $3,000. The Epson LS800 offers better value for versatile use, while the BenQ V5010i is better value for dedicated home theater use.
Both are equally future-proof with 4K resolution and HDR support, but the Epson LS800 has better gaming capabilities and streaming support, while the BenQ V5010i has superior color standards support.
We've done our best to create useful and informative comparisons to help you decide what product to buy. Our research uses advanced automated methods to create this comparison and perfection is not possible - please contact us for corrections or questions. These are the sites we've researched in the creation of this article: lbtechreviews.com - benq.com - benq.com - projectorcentral.com - projectorscreenstore.com - ooberpad.com - projectorscreen.com - benq.eu - tvsproslc.com - timesofindia.indiatimes.com - images.visunextgroup.com - techradar.com - danamic.org - projectorscreen.com - projectorcentral.com - epson.com - dreamediaav.com - dell.com - rtings.com - avsforum.com - audiogeneral.com - news.epson.com - projectorcentral.com