If you're looking to create an impressive home theater setup without dedicating an entire room to a traditional projector, today's Ultra Short Throw (UST) projectors offer an exciting solution. I've spent considerable time with both the AWOL Vision LTV-2500 ($2,999) and the Epson EpiqVision Ultra LS800 ($3,448), and I'm here to help you understand which might be right for your needs.
UST projectors sit just inches from your wall or screen, projecting upward at an extreme angle to create large images without requiring much room depth. Think of them as a way to get a massive TV-like experience without permanently mounting anything on your wall. These projectors have come a long way since their introduction, with major improvements in brightness, color accuracy, and smart features in the last few years.
Both of these models were released in late 2022, representing the current state of the art in consumer UST technology. They take different approaches to achieve their goals, which makes this comparison particularly interesting.
The AWOL LTV-2500 uses an RGB triple laser system, which means it creates colors using three distinct laser light sources (red, green, and blue). This results in exceptionally pure colors - covering 107% of the BT.2020 color space, which is notably wider than what most TVs can display. In practical terms, this means colors look more vibrant and natural, especially in content mastered for HDR (High Dynamic Range).
The Epson LS800 takes a different approach, using 3LCD technology with a laser light source. This system splits white light into primary colors using dichroic mirrors and passes each through its own LCD panel. While this might sound more complex, it's a proven technology that Epson has perfected over many years. The big advantage here is brightness - the LS800 outputs a massive 4,000 lumens compared to the LTV-2500's 2,000 lumens.
In my testing, both projectors produce excellent images, but they shine in different environments:
One of the most significant differences between these projectors is their throw ratio - how far they need to be from the wall to create a given image size:
This might not sound like a huge difference, but in practice, it can determine whether a UST projector will work in your space. The LS800's shorter throw distance makes it more flexible for tight spaces and reduces the chance of people walking between the projector and screen.
If you're planning to use your projector for gaming, input lag (the delay between pressing a button and seeing the result on screen) becomes crucial. Here's where we see another clear difference:
For casual gaming, either projector will work fine. However, for competitive gaming or fast-paced action games, the LS800's lower input lag makes it the better choice.
One unique feature of the AWOL LTV-2500 is its support for 3D content. While 3D might not be as popular as it once was, there's still a dedicated community of 3D enthusiasts, and many movies are available in 3D format. The LS800 doesn't support 3D at all, so if this feature matters to you, the LTV-2500 is your only option between these two.
Both projectors include built-in sound systems, but there's a notable difference in approach:
In practice, the LS800's sound system produces better-balanced audio with more bass presence. However, for a proper home theater setup, you'll want to pair either projector with a dedicated sound system or soundbar.
At $2,999, the AWOL LTV-2500 represents excellent value for home theater enthusiasts who prioritize image quality and color accuracy. Its triple laser system and superior HDR handling make it particularly appealing for movie watching in controlled lighting conditions.
The Epson LS800 at $3,448 costs more but justifies its premium with class-leading brightness, better gaming performance, and more flexible placement options. It's particularly well-suited for multi-purpose rooms where ambient light control isn't always possible.
Choose the LTV-2500 if:
Choose the LS800 if:
Both projectors represent significant improvements over previous generations of UST technology, offering better color accuracy, higher brightness, and more sophisticated smart features than models from just a few years ago.
After spending time with both projectors, I've found that they each excel in their intended environments. The LTV-2500's superior color accuracy and HDR performance make it my personal choice for a dedicated home theater room, while the LS800's brightness and versatility make it more suitable for living room use.
Remember that either projector will need a proper ALR (Ambient Light Rejecting) screen for the best performance - this isn't an optional accessory but rather a crucial part of the UST projection system. Factor this additional cost (typically $500-1,000) into your budget when making your decision.
Whichever you choose, both represent the current state of the art in UST projection technology and offer compelling alternatives to traditional large-screen TVs.
AWOL Vision LTV-2500 | Epson EpiqVision Ultra LS800 |
---|---|
Price - Base investment required | |
$2,999 (better value for dedicated theater use) | $3,448 (premium justified by brightness) |
Brightness - Most critical spec for daytime viewing | |
2,000 ANSI lumens (requires controlled lighting) | 4,000 ANSI lumens (excellent for bright rooms) |
Display Technology - Impacts color accuracy and longevity | |
RGB Triple Laser (superior color, 107% BT.2020) | 3LCD with Laser (excellent reliability, standard color range) |
Throw Ratio - Determines how close to wall needed | |
0.25:1 (needs ~16" for 100" screen) | 0.16:1 (needs only ~10" for 100" screen) |
Gaming Performance - Critical for responsive gaming | |
15ms input lag at 4K/60Hz (acceptable) | 16.7ms input lag (consistently good) |
HDR Support - Affects movie viewing quality | |
HDR10+ with dynamic tone mapping (excellent) | HDR10 only (good but less advanced) |
Built-in Audio - Important if not using external speakers | |
36W stereo (adequate) | 2.1 Yamaha system with subwoofer (superior) |
Special Features - Additional functionality | |
3D support, motorized screen compatibility | Better ambient light handling, superior gaming modes |
Lamp Life - Long term maintenance consideration | |
25,000 hours (excellent) | 20,000 hours (very good) |
The AWOL Vision LTV-2500 ($2,999) is better suited for dedicated theater rooms due to its superior color accuracy and HDR performance. While the Epson LS800 ($3,448) is brighter, that advantage is less important in controlled lighting conditions.
The Epson LS800 is significantly better for bright rooms with its 4,000 ANSI lumens compared to the LTV-2500's 2,000 lumens. This makes the Epson ideal for living rooms or spaces with ambient light.
For pure picture quality in optimal conditions, the AWOL LTV-2500 has the edge with its RGB triple laser system and superior HDR handling. However, the LS800 can look better in bright conditions due to its higher brightness.
The Epson LS800 is the better gaming choice with its consistent 16.7ms input lag and dedicated gaming port. While the LTV-2500 supports gaming, its performance isn't as optimized for this use case.
The Epson LS800 needs about 10 inches for a 100-inch image, while the LTV-2500 requires about 16 inches. Both are true ultra-short throw projectors, but the Epson offers more flexible placement options.
The Epson LS800 has superior built-in audio with its Yamaha 2.1 system including a subwoofer. The LTV-2500 has adequate 36W stereo sound but lacks the same depth and clarity.
Only the AWOL LTV-2500 supports 3D playback. The Epson LS800 does not offer 3D capability at all.
At $2,999, the AWOL LTV-2500 offers better value for home theater enthusiasts, while the $3,448 Epson LS800 justifies its higher price with superior brightness and flexibility.
The Epson LS800 is generally easier to set up due to its shorter throw ratio and more forgiving alignment requirements. The LTV-2500 requires more precise positioning but both need careful initial setup.
The Epson LS800 is better suited as a TV replacement due to its higher brightness and ambient light handling. The LTV-2500 can work but performs best in controlled lighting conditions.
We've done our best to create useful and informative comparisons to help you decide what product to buy. Our research uses advanced automated methods to create this comparison and perfection is not possible - please contact us for corrections or questions. These are the sites we've researched in the creation of this article: projectorjunkies.com - dreamediaav.com - projectorjunkies.com - avsforum.com - nothingprojector.com - projectorreviews.com - vividstorm.eu - projectorcentral.com - projectorcentral.com - projectorcentral.com - avsforum.com - dreamediaav.com - techradar.com - danamic.org - projectorscreen.com - projectorcentral.com - epson.com - dreamediaav.com - dell.com - rtings.com - avsforum.com - audiogeneral.com - news.epson.com - projectorcentral.com