The wireless earbud market has evolved dramatically since the original AirPods launched in 2016. Today's options offer features that seemed like science fiction just a few years ago - from spatial audio (which creates a virtual surround sound experience) to adaptive noise cancellation that adjusts to your environment in real-time.
Let's compare two compelling options: Apple's AirPods 3rd Generation ($169.99) and the Denon PerL Pro ($149-349), released in 2021 and 2023 respectively.
The AirPods 3 deliver solid audio quality for everyday listening. Apple's custom driver and amplifier create clear sound with decent bass, though it's not going to satisfy serious audiophiles. The standout feature is Spatial Audio with head tracking, which creates an immersive experience when watching movies or listening to compatible music. It's like having a mini theater in your head - when you turn your head, the sound stays anchored to your device, just like it would in a real theater.
The PerL Pro takes audio quality to another level. They support aptX Lossless (a technology that allows CD-quality wireless audio) and feature Masimo Adaptive Acoustic Technology, which actually measures your ear shape to customize the sound. Think of it like having a professional audio engineer tune the earbuds specifically for your ears.
In my testing, the difference is noticeable, especially with high-quality audio sources. The PerL Pro produces clearer separation between instruments and more detailed sound overall. For home theater use, both support spatial audio, but the PerL Pro's superior drivers and noise cancellation create a more cinema-like experience.
If you're heavily invested in Apple's ecosystem, the AirPods 3 offer some compelling advantages. They pair instantly with all your Apple devices and switch automatically between them. For example, you can be listening to music on your iPhone, start a video on your iPad, and the AirPods will switch over seamlessly. This convenience is hard to overstate in daily use.
The PerL Pro takes a more platform-agnostic approach. They work equally well with any device and support more advanced Bluetooth codecs. While they don't have Apple's magical instant pairing, they do offer multipoint connectivity - meaning you can stay connected to two devices simultaneously and switch between them easily.
Both options have improved significantly over their predecessors, but there's still a clear winner:
The PerL Pro's advantage is particularly noticeable during long listening sessions or travel. Both support wireless charging, but the PerL Pro adds fast charging via USB-C, while the AirPods 3 still use Lightning (though this may change in future models).
Comfort is subjective, but there are some key differences:
The AirPods 3 use Apple's one-size-fits-most design. They're incredibly light (4.28g each) and comfortable for many people, but they can feel loose during exercise. There's no way to adjust the fit.
The PerL Pro comes with multiple tip sizes and optional wing tips for a more secure fit. They're heavier (7.5g each) but generally stay put better during activity. The trade-off is that they feel more noticeable in your ears.
If you're planning to use these for watching movies and TV shows, both options support spatial audio, but there are important differences:
Both perform well for everyday tasks like calls and music listening, but they target different users:
The AirPods 3 excel at convenience. They're great for people who prioritize ease of use and Apple ecosystem integration over absolute audio quality. The touch controls are simple and reliable, and features like automatic ear detection work flawlessly.
The PerL Pro prioritize audio performance and flexibility. They're ideal for users who want the best possible sound quality and don't mind spending a few extra seconds on device switching. The companion app offers extensive customization options, including EQ settings and control customization.
When considering value, look beyond the price tag:
AirPods 3 ($169.99):
PerL Pro ($149-349):
Consider these key questions:
The AirPods 3 and PerL Pro represent two different approaches to wireless earbuds. The AirPods 3 prioritize convenience and ecosystem integration, while the PerL Pro focus on audio quality and features.
For most users not deeply invested in the Apple ecosystem, the PerL Pro offer better value and performance. However, if seamless Apple integration is a priority and you don't need noise cancellation, the AirPods 3 remain a solid choice.
Remember that both options represent significant improvements over previous generations, particularly in battery life and sound quality. Whichever you choose, you're getting a capable set of wireless earbuds that will serve you well for years to come.
Apple AirPods 3rd Generation ($169) | Denon PerL Pro ($149-349) |
---|---|
Sound Quality Technology - Determines overall listening experience and audio fidelity | |
Custom Apple driver with Adaptive EQ | aptX Lossless with Adaptive Acoustic Technology |
Active Noise Cancellation - Critical for noisy environments and immersive listening | |
None | Advanced ANC with ambient mode |
Battery Life - Important for all-day use without recharging | |
6 hours (30 with case) | 8 hours (32 with case) |
Ecosystem Integration - Affects ease of use across your devices | |
Seamless Apple integration, limited Android support | Universal compatibility, multipoint connection |
Water Resistance - Important for workouts and outdoor use | |
IPX4 | IPX4 |
Special Features - Additional capabilities that may justify price premium | |
Spatial Audio with head tracking, automatic device switching | Personalized sound profiles, lossless audio, customizable EQ |
Fit Customization - Affects comfort and secure placement | |
One-size design, no adjustability | Multiple ear tips, wing tips included |
Charging Options - Convenience factor for daily use | |
Lightning port, wireless charging | USB-C, wireless charging |
Voice Call Quality - Important for work and communication | |
Dual beamforming mics | 8 mics with bone conduction sensors |
Size/Weight - Affects comfort during extended wear | |
4.28g per bud (extremely light) | 7.5g per bud (slightly heavier) |
The Denon PerL Pro offers superior movie watching experience due to its active noise cancellation and better sound quality. While the AirPods 3 has spatial audio, the PerL Pro's enhanced bass and clarity make it the better choice for home theater use.
The Denon PerL Pro delivers notably better sound quality with its aptX Lossless support and personalized acoustic tuning. The AirPods 3 offers good but basic sound quality suitable for casual listening.
The Denon PerL Pro offers 8 hours per charge compared to 6 hours for the AirPods 3. With their cases, total battery life is 32 hours and 30 hours respectively.
Only the Denon PerL Pro features active noise cancellation. The AirPods 3 relies solely on passive noise isolation through its physical design.
The Denon PerL Pro has lower latency with supported devices and better sound quality for gaming. The AirPods 3 works well but primarily with Apple devices.
The Denon PerL Pro typically offers more features per dollar, including ANC and superior sound quality. However, the AirPods 3 value lies in its Apple ecosystem integration.
Both work well for calls, but the Denon PerL Pro has superior microphone technology with 8 mics including bone conduction sensors. The AirPods 3 uses dual beamforming mics which are still effective for most users.
We've done our best to create useful and informative comparisons to help you decide what product to buy. Our research uses advanced automated methods to create this comparison and perfection is not possible - please contact us for corrections or questions. These are the sites we've researched in the creation of this article: recordingnow.com - apple.com - youtube.com - bestbuy.com - support.apple.com - apple.com - portableone.com - apple.com - bhphotovideo.com - apple.com - apple.com - techradar.com - popsci.com - masimo.com - whathifi.com - audio46.com - headphones.com - head-fi.org - rtings.com - denon.com - stereonet.com - avsforum.com - audiosciencereview.com