The Roku Smart Home Video Doorbell & Chime SE ($79) stands out primarily for its value proposition and included chime functionality. While it doesn't match the Nest's video quality or AI capabilities, it offers a compelling package for budget-conscious buyers who already have doorbell wiring installed. The included indoor chime, something notably absent from the Nest, adds immediate functionality without requiring smart speakers or mobile devices for alerts. The hybrid power approach, using existing doorbell wiring with battery backup, provides reliable operation during power outages, though some users report inconsistent battery performance.
Where the Roku doorbell falls short is in its core video performance and smart features. The video quality degrades noticeably beyond 3-4 feet from the camera, making package monitoring less reliable, and its basic motion detection can't match the Nest's sophisticated AI identification system. However, at less than half the price of the Nest and with a lower monthly subscription cost ($3.99 vs $6), it represents a practical choice for users who prioritize basic doorbell functionality over advanced features. The integration with Roku TVs and streaming devices also offers unique appeal for users already invested in the Roku ecosystem, though third-party smart home compatibility is more limited compared to the Nest.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌Roku Smart Home Video Doorbell & Chime SE Wired Doorbell Details
💵 See Roku Smart Home Video Doorbell & Chime SE Wired Doorbell Price

The Wyze Video Doorbell v2 delivers surprising value at just $40, offering superior 2K resolution (2048x1536) that outclasses the Nest's HD camera. Its wider 166.8° field of view captures more of your porch area, and the inclusion of local storage via microSD card (up to 256GB) eliminates the need for expensive cloud subscriptions. The color night vision performs exceptionally well when there's ambient lighting, and the device's IP65 weather resistance actually exceeds the Nest's rating. For budget-conscious buyers who already have doorbell wiring, it's hard to ignore the substantial cost savings while getting higher resolution video.
However, the Wyze's wired-only design limits installation flexibility, and its AI features aren't quite as sophisticated as the Nest's advanced detection systems. While it works with both Alexa and Google Assistant, the app experience and smart home integration feel less polished compared to Nest's ecosystem. The included chime controller helps maintain compatibility with existing mechanical chimes, but initial setup requires some basic electrical knowledge. Despite these trade-offs, the Wyze delivers exceptional core performance at a fraction of the cost, making it a compelling alternative for those who prioritize video quality and value over battery convenience and premium AI features.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌Wyze Video Doorbell v2 Smart Doorbell Camera Details
💵 See Wyze Video Doorbell v2 Smart Doorbell Camera Price

The $200 Arlo Essential Wired Video Doorbell distinguishes itself with superior video quality and a more comprehensive field of view. Its 1536x1536 resolution delivers noticeably sharper footage than the Nest, while the 180° viewing angle ensures you won't miss packages left close to the door or cut off tall visitors. The hardwired installation, while less flexible than the Nest's battery option, provides consistently faster response times and eliminates the need for battery charging. The built-in siren and full-duplex two-way audio add valuable security features, while broader smart home compatibility (including Alexa, Google Assistant, and Apple HomeKit) makes it more versatile for mixed-ecosystem households.
However, the Arlo's advantages come at a price, both upfront and long-term. The higher initial cost and steeper subscription fees ($12.99/month vs Nest's $6) make it a more expensive investment over time. The hardwired-only installation might require professional help for homes without existing doorbell wiring, adding to the setup cost. While the Arlo Essential Wired delivers better raw performance in terms of video quality and response time, its basic motion detection capabilities don't match the Nest's sophisticated AI-powered alerts, which might be more valuable for many users than pure image quality.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌Arlo Essential Wired Video Doorbell Details
💵 See Arlo Essential Wired Video Doorbell Price

The Google Nest Hello stands out with its superior video capabilities, offering a higher 1600x1200 resolution and larger 3MP sensor that delivers noticeably clearer footage. Its wider 160-degree field of view captures more of your entryway, while enhanced IR LEDs provide superior night vision performance. Though it requires hardwiring, this constant power source enables true 24/7 continuous recording - a significant advantage over event-based recording. The Hello's 8x digital zoom provides better detail when reviewing footage, making it easier to read package labels or identify visitors from a distance.
Despite being discontinued by Google, the Google Nest Hello remains a compelling option for those prioritizing video quality and continuous monitoring. While its $229 price tag and required professional installation add to the initial cost, the superior image quality and reliable performance may justify the investment for security-conscious users. The main tradeoff is the mandatory Nest Aware subscription ($6/month) for advanced features and recording storage. However, for those with existing doorbell wiring who want the best possible video quality and don't mind the subscription model, the Hello's premium performance and rock-solid reliability make it a worthwhile consideration despite its higher total cost of ownership.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌Google Nest Hello Smart Video Doorbell Details
💵 See Google Nest Hello Smart Video Doorbell Price

The Anker eufy Video Smart Lock S330 ($349.99) represents a more comprehensive approach to entrance security by combining a smart lock with video monitoring capabilities. Its standout feature is the integration of multiple access methods, including rapid fingerprint recognition (0.3 seconds), digital keypad, mobile app control, and traditional keys, all while capturing 2K resolution video. The higher resolution provides noticeably sharper images than the Nest Doorbell, making it easier to identify visitors and read package labels. While the initial cost is higher, the S330 eliminates ongoing subscription fees by utilizing local storage through an SD card (up to 128GB), potentially offering better long-term value for users who want both access control and video monitoring.
The S330 distinguishes itself with robust build quality and impressive weather resistance, rated IP65 and capable of operating in temperatures from -22°F to 158°F. Its 10,000mAh battery powers both the lock and video functions for several months between charges, though installation is more involved since it replaces your existing door lock. While it lacks some of the Nest's sophisticated AI detection features, it offers broader smart home compatibility, working with both Alexa and Google Assistant. The combination of access control and video monitoring in a single device might justify the higher upfront cost for users seeking a complete entrance security solution, especially considering the potential expense of purchasing and maintaining separate smart lock and video doorbell systems.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌Anker eufy Video Smart Lock S330 Door Lock Details
💵 See Anker eufy Video Smart Lock S330 Door Lock Price

The Google Nest Hello Video Doorbell ($229) distinguishes itself with superior video quality from its 3MP sensor, delivering crisp 1600x1200 resolution footage that makes facial recognition and package identification notably clearer. Its wired installation, while potentially more complicated upfront, eliminates battery charging concerns and enables true 24/7 continuous recording when paired with a Nest Aware Plus subscription. The higher-quality sensor also provides better performance in challenging lighting conditions and superior night vision capabilities, making it particularly valuable for security-focused users who need reliable footage regardless of conditions.
While the Hello's higher price point and installation requirements might seem like hurdles, the long-term benefits of consistent power and better video quality make it a compelling option for homeowners planning to stay put. Its more refined facial recognition capabilities and wider 160-degree field of view provide meaningful advantages for monitoring your entryway. However, potential buyers should factor in possible professional installation costs ($100-200) if they don't have existing doorbell wiring or aren't comfortable with electrical work. The lack of free video history also means you'll need to consider subscription costs in your total investment, though the superior video quality and constant power connection make the most of these advanced features.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌Google Nest Hello Video Doorbell Details
💵 See Google Nest Hello Video Doorbell Price

The $129.99 Ring Peephole Cam distinguishes itself with its innovative peephole installation design and impressive battery life. This unique approach makes it ideal for renters and apartment dwellers who can't modify their doors or walls, offering a true plug-and-play solution that takes just minutes to install. The removable battery lasting 6-12 months means less maintenance compared to our reviewed Nest, and the ability to quickly swap batteries ensures you're never without doorbell coverage. The addition of knock detection technology also provides an extra layer of awareness that's particularly useful in apartment settings.
However, the Ring Peephole Cam does make some compromises in video quality and smart features. While its 1080p resolution is adequate, it lacks HDR capability and doesn't offer the same level of AI-powered detection features. The basic motion detection and simpler alert system might generate more false notifications compared to Nest's intelligent detection. That said, the lower subscription costs for Ring Protect plans and the significantly longer battery life make it a more economical choice for long-term use. For those prioritizing easy installation and minimal maintenance over advanced AI features, the Ring Peephole Cam represents an excellent value, especially in rental situations where mounting options are limited.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌Ring Peephole Cam Video Doorbell Details
💵 See Ring Peephole Cam Video Doorbell Price

The TP-Link Tapo TD25 delivers impressive value at $79.99 with several advantages over the Nest Doorbell. Its standout 2K resolution (2560x1920) provides noticeably sharper image quality, while the ultra-wide 180-degree field of view captures more of your entryway. The TD25's robust 10000mAh battery lasts up to 8 months between charges, and when hardwired, it supports true 24/7 recording with pre-roll capture - features the Nest Doorbell lacks. Perhaps most significantly, the TD25 includes advanced AI detection features for people, packages, pets, and vehicles without requiring a subscription, and offers flexible storage options including local microSD support up to 512GB.
While the TD25's app experience and design aesthetics may not match the Nest's polish, it compensates with superior technical capabilities and better long-term value. The inclusion of color night vision with built-in spotlights, better weather resistance (IP65), and broader operating temperature range make it more versatile in challenging conditions. For users who prioritize performance and features over ecosystem integration, the TD25's comprehensive feature set and lower total cost of ownership make it a compelling alternative to the Nest Doorbell, especially considering no subscription is required for advanced features.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌TP-Link Tapo TD25 Smart Video Doorbell 2K 5MP Details
💵 See TP-Link Tapo TD25 Smart Video Doorbell 2K 5MP Price

The Ring Wired Doorbell Pro stands out with its superior 1536p HD+ video quality and advanced motion detection capabilities. The higher resolution makes a noticeable difference when identifying faces or reading package labels, while its HDR support handles challenging lighting conditions better than the Nest. The hardwired-only design, while requiring more complex installation, ensures reliable performance without battery concerns and enables features like 3D Motion Detection with Bird's Eye View mapping. This unique radar-based technology creates a top-down view of visitor movements, providing more contextual awareness of activity around your door.
Where the Ring Wired Doorbell Pro really shines is in its integration with Alexa and premium features like color night vision and Pre-roll video capture. Though priced higher at $249 and requiring a subscription for basic recording features, it delivers consistently better video quality and more reliable performance in extreme temperatures. The Alexa Greetings feature can automatically interact with visitors and take messages, while Quick Replies provide pre-recorded responses - features not available on the Nest. However, these advanced capabilities come with the trade-off of mandatory subscription costs and more complex installation requirements. For those prioritizing video quality and advanced security features over installation flexibility, and especially for those already invested in the Ring or Alexa ecosystem, the Ring Pro's premium approach delivers superior overall performance.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌Ring Wired Doorbell Pro Details
💵 See Ring Wired Doorbell Pro Price

The Eufy Security E340 takes a more comprehensive approach to doorbell security with its innovative dual-camera system - a 2K front-facing camera paired with a downward-facing camera that eliminates common blind spots. This design proves particularly valuable for package monitoring and complete entryway coverage. The E340's local storage approach, with 8GB built-in capacity, means you'll never pay subscription fees, and your footage remains accessible even during internet outages. Its color night vision capability, powered by a dual-light system, provides clearer nighttime footage up to 16 feet, exceeding the Nest's infrared performance.
However, the Eufy Security E340 does have some tradeoffs compared to the Nest. Its battery life is shorter at 2-3 months, though this is mitigated by a swappable battery design that eliminates charging downtime. While it works with both Alexa and Google Assistant, the integration isn't as seamless as the Nest's native Google ecosystem experience. The E340's higher resolution and dual cameras do deliver superior video quality and coverage, but the interface and AI features, while capable, don't feel quite as polished as Google's offering. Still, given the substantial long-term savings from avoiding subscription fees and the superior coverage from the dual-camera system, the E340 presents a more compelling value proposition for most users who don't require deep Google integration.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌Eufy Security E340 2K Dual Camera Video Doorbell Details
💵 See Eufy Security E340 2K Dual Camera Video Doorbell Price

The Ring Battery Doorbell Pro ($230) distinguishes itself with superior video quality, offering 1536p HD+ resolution and an expansive 150-degree field of view both horizontally and vertically. Its standout feature is the innovative power management system, featuring a swappable battery design that eliminates downtime during charging and compatibility with a seamlessly integrated solar panel. The color night vision with adaptive IR LEDs provides notably clearer nighttime footage, while the 3D Motion Detection and Bird's Eye View features offer precise movement tracking and an overhead map view of visitor activities.
However, the Ring Battery Doorbell Pro requires a subscription to unlock many of its advanced features, including video recording and smart detection capabilities, adding to the already higher initial cost. The subscription starts at $5 monthly for basic features or $10 monthly for the Plus plan with additional features. While it excels in video quality and power management flexibility, these advantages come at a premium price point compared to the Nest's more affordable package. The Ring Pro's integration with Alexa makes it particularly appealing for Amazon smart home users, but those seeking comprehensive features without subscription fees might find the higher upfront cost harder to justify.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌Ring Battery Doorbell Pro Smart Wi-Fi Video Doorbell Details
💵 See Ring Battery Doorbell Pro Smart Wi-Fi Video Doorbell Price

The Ring Battery Doorbell Plus distinguishes itself with superior 1536p HD video quality and a more practical head-to-toe 150° viewing angle, making it particularly effective for package monitoring and visitor identification. Its removable battery system is a significant advantage, allowing users to swap in a spare battery rather than taking the entire doorbell offline for charging. While its $149 price point is lower than the Nest's initial cost, users should factor in the required Ring Protect subscription ($3-10 monthly) for features like video recording and smart alerts, which Nest includes for free.
Where Ring excels is in its integration with the Amazon ecosystem and overall hardware capabilities. The Ring Battery Doorbell Plus offers color night vision, better video resolution for viewing on large screens, and compatibility with existing doorbell chimes when hardwired. Its battery life typically extends to 2-6 months, notably longer than Nest's duration, and the ability to use Ring Chime accessories provides more flexible installation options. However, users who don't need the highest resolution video or aren't already invested in the Amazon ecosystem might find Nest's free intelligent alerts and local storage more valuable despite Ring's superior hardware specifications.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌Ring Battery Doorbell Plus Smart Video Doorbell Details
💵 See Ring Battery Doorbell Plus Smart Video Doorbell Price

The Ring Wired Doorbell Plus ($150) distinguishes itself with superior video quality, offering 1536p resolution that delivers noticeably clearer and more detailed images than the Nest. This higher resolution makes a real difference when identifying visitors or reading package labels, especially in challenging lighting conditions or when viewing footage on larger screens. The hardwired-only design, while less flexible for installation, provides advantages in daily use: near-instant notifications, immediate live view access, and no need to worry about battery life or recharging. The Ring's wider 180-degree field of view also ensures you won't miss anything, capturing everything from full-height visitors to packages left right against your doorstep.
While the Ring Wired Doorbell Plus requires a $4 monthly subscription to access most features, it compensates with better overall performance and reliability. The color night vision produces notably clearer footage after dark, and the integration with Amazon's Alexa ecosystem is comprehensive, allowing for convenient viewing on Fire TV devices and announcements through Echo speakers. The lower initial hardware cost helps offset the subscription requirement, and the hardwired connection ensures consistent performance without the occasional delays or wake-up times associated with battery-powered units. However, the requirement for existing doorbell wiring and the mandatory subscription might make it less appealing for homes without proper wiring or those seeking a subscription-free solution.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌Ring Wired Doorbell Plus Video Doorbell Details
💵 See Ring Wired Doorbell Plus Video Doorbell Price

The SimpliSafe Video Doorbell Pro distinguishes itself from the Nest Battery with superior video quality, delivering consistent 1080p HDR footage through its hardwired connection. Its dual-sensor motion detection system, combining both heat signature and visual detection, proves particularly effective at reducing false alerts while maintaining reliable surveillance. The slightly wider 162-degree field of view captures more of your entryway, and the consistent power supply ensures uninterrupted performance without the need for battery management. While it requires existing doorbell wiring, this traditional approach eliminates concerns about battery life in extreme temperatures or high-traffic situations.
At $169, the SimpliSafe Pro represents strong value for those with existing doorbell wiring, especially considering its superior video resolution and reliable performance. The lower monthly subscription cost of $4.99 for video recording makes it more economical long-term compared to Nest's pricing structure. While it may lack Nest's AI-powered detection features and flexible installation options, SimpliSafe's focus on core functionality - clear video, reliable motion detection, and consistent performance - makes it a compelling choice for users who prioritize video quality and straightforward operation. The system particularly shines in challenging lighting conditions, where its HDR capabilities and powerful infrared night vision provide clearer footage than Nest's battery-powered solution.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌SimpliSafe Video Doorbell Pro Wired Doorbell Camera Details
💵 See SimpliSafe Video Doorbell Pro Wired Doorbell Camera Price

The Arlo Video Doorbell 2nd Generation makes a compelling case at just $79.99, offering superior video quality with 2K resolution (1536x1536) and an ultra-wide 180-degree field of view. This higher resolution provides noticeably sharper detail when identifying visitors or reading package labels, while the wider viewing angle ensures you can see everything from packages left against your door to visitors standing off to the side. The doorbell also includes a built-in siren for deterring unwanted visitors and supports pre-recorded messages for automated responses, features not found on many competitors.
Despite its lower price point, the Arlo Video Doorbell 2nd Generation does require a subscription ($4.99/month) to access cloud storage and smart detection features, which adds to the long-term cost. However, its battery life typically outperforms the Nest, lasting 3-4 months between charges under normal use. While its smart detection capabilities aren't as sophisticated as Nest's free offering, the Arlo's superior video quality and wider field of view make it an excellent choice for users who prioritize raw performance over AI features, especially those already using Alexa-enabled devices.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌Arlo Video Doorbell 2nd Generation Details
💵 See Arlo Video Doorbell 2nd Generation Price

The Ring Battery Doorbell stands out with its superior 1536p HD video resolution, delivering noticeably sharper footage than the Nest's 960 x 1280 output. Its removable battery system proves incredibly convenient in real-world use, allowing you to keep a spare charged and swap without taking down the entire unit. While Ring's subscription requirement for basic features like video recording might seem restrictive, the $4 monthly fee is lower than Nest Aware, and you get more extensive video history (180 days versus 30). The color night vision also provides more natural-looking footage after dark, making it easier to identify important details like car colors or clothing.
Where Ring's approach falls short is in its free tier offerings - without a subscription, you're limited to just live viewing. However, its longer battery life of 6-12 months means less frequent maintenance than the Nest, and its 150-degree field of view captures a wider area. The Ring Battery Doorbell particularly shines for users who prioritize video quality and power flexibility, or those already invested in the Ring/Alexa ecosystem. While you'll need to factor in the subscription cost, the combination of superior video quality, removable battery, and longer battery life makes it a compelling choice for those willing to pay for advanced features.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌Ring Battery Doorbell Video Doorbell Details
💵 See Ring Battery Doorbell Video Doorbell Price